2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insertion loss of sonic crystal made with multi resonant shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, over the entire frequency range of 100-5000 Hz, the trends and magnitudes of the experiment and simulation results are corresponding and particularly well compared in the frequency range of 630-1000 Hz. This firstly suggests that the simulation model is feasible for the current numerical experiments and the reported simulation results are supposed to be convinced [19,32,33,[35][36][37]. It is noted that the highest value of ∆LA eq is occurred at 1000 Hz both in experiment and simulation, followed by 800 Hz.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, over the entire frequency range of 100-5000 Hz, the trends and magnitudes of the experiment and simulation results are corresponding and particularly well compared in the frequency range of 630-1000 Hz. This firstly suggests that the simulation model is feasible for the current numerical experiments and the reported simulation results are supposed to be convinced [19,32,33,[35][36][37]. It is noted that the highest value of ∆LA eq is occurred at 1000 Hz both in experiment and simulation, followed by 800 Hz.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It was observed that within a certain limit a better noise attenuation performance can be attained when the volume of the cavity was increased. Mohapatra et al [19] studied the insertion loss of four different scatterers that were comprised of two cylindrical shells (inner and outer) but different configurations of the opening slit. It was discovered that the function of the outer shell tended to shift the resonance frequency of the scatterer to the low-frequency side while the inner shell indicated the opposite effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reference, other experimental studies also have been performed using portable anechoic chamber. [26][27][28] (b) The sound pressure has been measured with PCB© free field array microphone. The calibration of the microphone has been carried out with an L&D© class one calibrator with (model no CAL-200©).…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reference, other experimental studies also have been performed using portable anechoic chamber. 2628…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between sonic crystal and acoustic metamaterial is that the band gap in sonic crystal is due to the periodicity of unit cells, whereas in metamaterials, there is one additional band gap due to the local resonant behaviour of unit cells. 17,18 Mohapatra and Jena 19 designed a metamaterial by placing two Helmholtz resonators co-axially as scatterers. The designed structure exhibited the band properties of both resonators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%