2008
DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2008.38.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insertion and removal torques according to orthodontic mini-screw design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a high insertion torque, long-term stability has been seen to decline over time, as the excessive stress initially distributed to the surrounding bone is balanced or micro-damage occurs. 19 In this study, screw-root proximity and age were the factors affecting the success rate, whereas sex, jaw, placement side, and placement location did not. In instances in which the miniscrew contacted a root, the success rate was 40.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Despite a high insertion torque, long-term stability has been seen to decline over time, as the excessive stress initially distributed to the surrounding bone is balanced or micro-damage occurs. 19 In this study, screw-root proximity and age were the factors affecting the success rate, whereas sex, jaw, placement side, and placement location did not. In instances in which the miniscrew contacted a root, the success rate was 40.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…To improve success rate of 1.6 mm-diameter mini-implants, they recommended the placement torque to be from 5 to 10 NCm [ 23 ]. Self-drilling system and tapered mini-implants may increase primary stability, but harmful stress can be generated if the torque is excessive [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion torque analysis was used to measure the mechanical retention achieved by screwing[ 11 14 ] and removal torque analysis is a method used to assess the stability and the osseointegration capacity of MSIs. [ 20 21 ] We did not want to experience any unwanted increases or decreases in terms of MIT, MRT or mobility. We found a significant ( P < 0.01) difference in terms of MIT between the control and MIR groups (this difference was within the desired limits) and we observed an improvement in terms of MRT and mobility, but the difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%