2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insensitivity to response-contingent feedback in adolescents with developmental language disorder (DLD)

Abstract: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficiency of the use of response-contingent feedback in adolescents with and without developmental language disorder (DLD) by using the balloon analogue risk task (BART). The BIS/BAS scales were also used to evaluate a participant’s responses to reward- or punishment-related events in everyday situations. The results showed that adolescents with DLD performed on the BART at a suboptimal level due to inefficient use of response-contingent feedback. Findings of the BI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that ineffective feedback processing contributes to the impaired learning observed in children with DLD (e.g., [ 1 , 2 , 57 ]. More specifically, when engaged in feedback-based learning, children with DLD have been shown to exhibit poor learning outcomes and differences in the electrophysiological markers of feedback processing, i.e., feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a event-related potential (ERP) components, when compared with their peers [ 2 , 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that ineffective feedback processing contributes to the impaired learning observed in children with DLD (e.g., [ 1 , 2 , 57 ]. More specifically, when engaged in feedback-based learning, children with DLD have been shown to exhibit poor learning outcomes and differences in the electrophysiological markers of feedback processing, i.e., feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a event-related potential (ERP) components, when compared with their peers [ 2 , 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%