2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, inner bark species were still abundant in CT areas in 2013, even if they declined from 2012 to 2013. In addition, there was no delay between the increase in abundance of inner and outer bark beetles, both within or between seasons, possibly because outer bark species recovered in this study feed on early succession fungi (Vanderwel et al 2006). The expected effect on saproxylic beetles of the woody debris gradient produced by the treatments was not observed, in part because girdled trees took two summers to die, suggesting that canopy openness had a greater effect on beetles than the amount of residual wood, which is consistent with another study of the effect of biomass removal on leaf litter invertebrates (Work et al 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Treatments On Beetle Feeding Guildsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, inner bark species were still abundant in CT areas in 2013, even if they declined from 2012 to 2013. In addition, there was no delay between the increase in abundance of inner and outer bark beetles, both within or between seasons, possibly because outer bark species recovered in this study feed on early succession fungi (Vanderwel et al 2006). The expected effect on saproxylic beetles of the woody debris gradient produced by the treatments was not observed, in part because girdled trees took two summers to die, suggesting that canopy openness had a greater effect on beetles than the amount of residual wood, which is consistent with another study of the effect of biomass removal on leaf litter invertebrates (Work et al 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Treatments On Beetle Feeding Guildsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Conversely, our hypotheses for specific feeding guilds were poorly supported because beetle response to the treatments was strong and similar across guilds. Changes in chemical and structural components of dead wood occur over time and should promote beetle species succession (reviewed in Nadeau et al 2015b), with inner bark species colonizing woody debris first but declining in abundance rapidly because dead wood is only fresh for a short period (Hammond et al 2001(Hammond et al , 2004, and outer bark species colonizing later (Esseen et al 1992, Vanderwel et al 2006. However, inner bark species were still abundant in CT areas in 2013, even if they declined from 2012 to 2013.…”
Section: Effects Of Treatments On Beetle Feeding Guildsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree species-specific structures (e.g. bark thickness, surface quality) become less pronounced during the decomposition process [37]. The significance of tree species as driving factor of specialization in deadwoodbased interaction networks therefore lessens with ongoing decay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many saproxylic beetle species show a clear preference for a particular decay stage and the turnover of community composition during the decay process has been described before [37,38]. Each successional community may contribute differently to network architecture.…”
Section: (F ) Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Individuals preferentially selected recently decayed snags (decay class 4), and avoided mid-(decay class 6) and advanced-decay snags (decay class 8). Saproxylic insect density in black spruce is higher in recently decayed snags (Saint-Germain et al 2007) and recently dwd (Vanderwel et al 2006). In the study area, these substrates were mainly located in post-mature coniferous stands, which Black-backed Woodpeckers have recently been shown to preferentially select for foraging (Tremblay et al 2009).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Foraging Substratesmentioning
confidence: 97%