2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-018-0834-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InSAR analysis for detecting the route of hydrothermal fluid to the surface during the 2015 phreatic eruption of Hakone Volcano, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DC component of the integrated waveform close to 4 cm was observed at KMYB. The proportionality constant between the static tilt change and A nearly vertical open crack at a shallow depth that was obtained from InSAR data is indicated by small black rectangles (Doke et al 2018). The eruption center is illustrated by a white circle.…”
Section: Tilt-change Data Recorded By Broadband Seismometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DC component of the integrated waveform close to 4 cm was observed at KMYB. The proportionality constant between the static tilt change and A nearly vertical open crack at a shallow depth that was obtained from InSAR data is indicated by small black rectangles (Doke et al 2018). The eruption center is illustrated by a white circle.…”
Section: Tilt-change Data Recorded By Broadband Seismometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data could reflect different phenomena beneath Hakone volcano. Doke et al (2018) obtained the pressure source model using InSAR data taken before and after the eruption. The time resolution in their analysis was several weeks, which is significantly longer than the period of our analysis, although InSAR techniques have enabled us to perform high-resolution mapping of surface deformation.…”
Section: Pressure Source Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 2015 Hakone eruption and unrest, InSAR data were critically important for planning mitigation measures ) and has to date resulted in three prominent literature contributions related to InSAR, two in this special issue Kuraoka et al 2018) and one in another journal (Kobayashi et al 2018). Doke et al (2018) detected the open crack that was formed by the 2015 eruption by analysis of ground deformation observed by satellite InSAR. The eruption center was formed at the northern end of the open crack.…”
Section: Insarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since old craters align on the ground surface just above the open crack, the 2015 eruption was interpreted as a reactivation of a pre-existing crack that was formed by earlier eruptions. The detailed analysis of Doke et al (2018) detected a sill-like deflation source beneath the crack, which is considered the source of hydrothermal fluid that formed the open crack. The pre-eruptive pressurization of the hydrothermal system of the volcano was also detected as local uplift by the InSAR analysis.…”
Section: Insarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our preliminary evaluation suggested a single inflation source at ~ 5.4 km depth that reasonably reconstructed the surface dislocation (root-mean-square (RMS) error = 1.2 × 10 −3 ). However, an interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) analysis implied that a crack opened at shallow depths in the volcano during the phreatic eruption (Doke et al 2018a). They also implied the existence of a deflation sill at ~ 250 m above sea level, which appears to deflate during the eruption and is assumed to be the source of the hydrothermal fluid that erupted.…”
Section: Gnss Data and Location Of Inflation Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%