2020
DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.742789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

İnsansız Hava Araçları ve Uydu Görüntülerinden Elde Edilen Veri Seti ile Havaalanlarının Tespitinin Yapılmasında SSD ve Faster R-CNN Algoritmalarının Karşılaştırılması

Abstract: Today, image processing has been used in many different sectors, especially in health, production and military fields, for various purposes directly in human life. The development of deep learning algorithms and starting to use of computer vision has accelerated the studies such as critical target, important location and strategic region determination especially in the military field. In this study, the airport has been determined on the landing runways. Training, test and evaluation data sets were created by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this, it can be said that the SSD MobileNet model performed well compared to the Faster R-CNN model in classifying the seeds. However, the models' performance obtained in this study was different from the performance obtained in the study by Zeren et al [25]. In their study, the Faster R-CNN model performed better than the SSD MobileNet model in detecting an airport.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Model Comparison In Seed Germinat...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With this, it can be said that the SSD MobileNet model performed well compared to the Faster R-CNN model in classifying the seeds. However, the models' performance obtained in this study was different from the performance obtained in the study by Zeren et al [25]. In their study, the Faster R-CNN model performed better than the SSD MobileNet model in detecting an airport.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Model Comparison In Seed Germinat...contrasting
confidence: 99%