2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inquests into patients who die while under a deprivation of liberty order

Abstract: Coroners have received guidance from the chief coroner that an inquest should be held after the death of a patient who is under a deprivation of liberty order. Sarah Ormond-Walshe and colleagues consider the legal situation and its implications for doctors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of the DoLS within the palliative care population has raised a number of concerns. These include significant delays in the assessment process,11 the difficulty determining the exact point at which the Safeguards are required,12 and the requirements for an inquest if a patient dies while subject to the DoLS 13. While these issues are not unique to palliative care, the complexity and vulnerability of this patient group, combined with the short length of stay in most hospices, has led to concern over the limited utility of the Safeguards in this patient population (see online supplementary box S2 for case examples) 14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the DoLS within the palliative care population has raised a number of concerns. These include significant delays in the assessment process,11 the difficulty determining the exact point at which the Safeguards are required,12 and the requirements for an inquest if a patient dies while subject to the DoLS 13. While these issues are not unique to palliative care, the complexity and vulnerability of this patient group, combined with the short length of stay in most hospices, has led to concern over the limited utility of the Safeguards in this patient population (see online supplementary box S2 for case examples) 14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%