2013
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-12-00076.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input Data Requirements for Lagrangian Trajectory Models

Abstract: In October 2011 an American Geophysical Union Chapman Conference was held in Grindelwald, Switzerland, titled “Advances in Lagrangian Modeling of the Atmosphere.” Lagrangian models are being applied to a wide range of high-impact atmospheric phenomena, such as the transport of volcanic ash and dispersion of radioactive releases. One common theme that arose during the meeting is the need for improved access to the output products of forecast models and reanalysis systems, which are used as in-puts to trajectory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stohl et al (2001) suggest typical average errors of approximately 20% of the travel distance and accordingly to Bowman et al (2012) globally averaged error of around 350 km can be found in lagrangian methodologies considering 6-h wind sampling for 5 days forward trajectories. These errors are mainly associated with the temporal resolution of input data (Bowman et al, 2013). Moreover, there are numerical errors related with the temporal variation of the particles' moisture, which produces miscalculation on the moisture transport (Stohl and James, 2004), and important uncertainties can be found if the method does not properly close the water cycle Gimeno et al (2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stohl et al (2001) suggest typical average errors of approximately 20% of the travel distance and accordingly to Bowman et al (2012) globally averaged error of around 350 km can be found in lagrangian methodologies considering 6-h wind sampling for 5 days forward trajectories. These errors are mainly associated with the temporal resolution of input data (Bowman et al, 2013). Moreover, there are numerical errors related with the temporal variation of the particles' moisture, which produces miscalculation on the moisture transport (Stohl and James, 2004), and important uncertainties can be found if the method does not properly close the water cycle Gimeno et al (2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of back trajectories to the temporal and spatial resolution of meteorological data is discussed in Draxler (1987). The temporal resolution is likely to have had an impact on trajectories, but the necessary temporal resolution increases with the horizontal resolution (Bowman et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (Wrf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known since Brewer's seminal work on stratospheric circulation that tropical tropopause temperature is the main driver of stratospheric H 2 O concentration (Brewer, 1949). As parcels approach and pass through the cold-point tropopause -the altitude at which air temperature is the coldest -condensation occurs and ice falls out, thereby regulating the parcel's H 2 O concentration to the local saturation level (e.g., Fueglistaler et al, 2009, and references therein).…”
Section: Trajectory Model and Temperatures Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory model used here follows the details described in Schoeberl and Dessler (2011), with parcel positions integrated using the Bowman trajectory code (Bowman, 1993;Bowman et al, 2013). This model has been proven capable of simulating stratospheric H 2 O and its long-term variability (Schoeberl and Dessler, 2011;Schoeberl et al, 2012Schoeberl et al, , 2013Dessler et al, 2014), modeling chemical tracer transport in the lower stratosphere , and studying the stratospheric air age spectrum (Ray et al, 2014).…”
Section: Trajectory Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%