Inpatients’ assessment of outcome at psychiatric institutions: an analysis of predictors following a national cross-sectional survey in Norway

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective was to assess the importance of different types of predictors for patient-reported outcome, both background factors at the patient level and healthcare predictors related to structure and processes of healthcare.DesignCross-sectional patient experience survey.SettingAll 280 secondary care institutions in Norway providing inpatient care for adult psychiatric patients.Participants1683 inpatients responded to the questionnaire on-site (73.4%).Primary outcome measuresThe outcome scale of the Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire–On-Site was the primary dependent variable. The scale consists of five items relating to overall patient satisfaction, benefit of treatment and patient enablement. Regressions were used to assess predictors, for all patients and for five different patient groups reported by the patients including anxiety/depression, drug-related problems and eating disorders.ResultsMultilevel linear regression for all patients showed that background factors related to overall current state, self-perceived mental health before admission and admission type were the most important predictors for patient-assessed outcome. Poor current state was associated with poor assessment of outcome (estimate: 8.64, p<0.001), poor health before admission was associated with better outcome (estimate: −6.89, p<0.001) and patients with urgent admission had poorer scores on the outcome scale (estimate: 4.40, p<0.001). A range of structure and healthcare variables were related to patient-assessed outcome, the most important being clinicians/personnel understanding your situation, treatment adjusted to your situation and adequate information about mental health condition.ConclusionsSelf-perceived mental health before admission, current overall state and type of admission were the most important background factors for patient-assessed outcome. The most important structure and process variables were related to patient-centred interaction. The background factors should be considered in case-mix adjustments of quality indicators, while the process variables could be used as focus areas in work aiming to improve patients’ assessment of outcome.

Reliability And Validity of The Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire – Continuous Electronic Measurement (PIPEQ-CEM)

“…Another previous national study using the PIPEQ-OS assessed the importance of different types of patientreported predictors for outcome assessments for mental health inpatients. The results indicated that the most important structure and process variables for patient outcome assessments were related to patientcentred interactions [19].…”

Reliability and validity of the Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire – Continuous Electronic Measurement (PIPEQ-CEM)

“…Another previous national study using the PIPEQ-OS assessed the importance of different types of patient-reported predictors for outcome assessments for mental health inpatients. The results indicated that the most important structure and process variables for patient outcome assessments were related to patient-centred interactions [ 19 ].…”

Family involvement and patient-experienced improvement and satisfaction with care: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Danish psychiatric hospitals

“…using three main diagnosis categories) or unaccounted confounding from, e.g. socioeconomic status [ 28 ]. However, adjustment for patient age, sex and main diagnosis had no substantial influence on the unadjusted point estimates indicating that confounding from these factors has only minor influence on the results.…”