2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inpatient Consultative Dermatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic procedures recommended by an appropriately consulted dermatologist yield a definitive diagnosis in up to 80% of cases. Moreover, 45% to 80% of diagnoses will change after dermatology consultation preventing unnecessary therapy and costly hospital stays [7]. Finally, dermatology consultation may also facilitate outpatient follow-up for a procedure rather than performing it during admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic procedures recommended by an appropriately consulted dermatologist yield a definitive diagnosis in up to 80% of cases. Moreover, 45% to 80% of diagnoses will change after dermatology consultation preventing unnecessary therapy and costly hospital stays [7]. Finally, dermatology consultation may also facilitate outpatient follow-up for a procedure rather than performing it during admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible skin infections in HSCT patients include fungal, bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections [11][12][13][14]. These skin pathologies may have atypical presentations in immunocompromised patients, making a dermatology consultation an important consideration [15]. Dermatologists have been shown to more accurately diagnose skin pathologies compared to generalists, and diagnoses often change after consultation [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, dermatology consultation leads to improved diagnostic accuracy and avoids unnecessary treatments, which in turn can potentially lead to cost savings [16]. However, excluding large academic or teaching institutions, most hospitals only have dermatologists available as consultants rather than direct inpatient teams [15]. This study aimed to (1) identity the type and incidence of skin infections, (2) describe the use of diagnostic tests for infectious class identification, and (3) identify the role and prevalence of dermatology consults in diagnosis of skin infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las IC solicitadas abarcan una amplia gama de afecciones, que incluyen dermatosis inflamatorias, procesos infecciosos, reacciones adversas a medicamentos y trastornos neoplásicos, muchas de las cuales pueden diagnosticarse solo por el examen físico dermatológico, pero cuando es necesario, la biopsia cutánea puede aportar información importante relacionada con el diagnóstico [41].  Alta médica antes de la IC en seis casos.…”
Section: La Interconsulta Hospitalaria En Dermatologíaunclassified
“…Es importante realizar un diagnóstico diferencial con los exantemas virales y con las etapas iniciales de reacciones adversas cutáneas graves que incluyen el síndrome de DRESS, el SSJ y la NET.El tratamiento es de soporte, con la supresión del fármaco responsable, la aplicación de corticoides tópicos de potencia intermedia y el empleo de antihistamínicos orales para controlar el prurito. Se evita el uso de corticoides sistémicos, ya que no hay evidencia científica de que estos aceleren la resolución del cuadro[41].En el estudio realizado por Ding et al[99] en Malasia entre enero de 2001 y diciembre de 2008 destacaron en primer lugar las erupciones maculopapulares(39,5 %) Los mismos resultados aparecen en el estudio llevado a cabo por Botelho et al[101], en el que los anticonvulsivantes fueron responsables del 23,9 % de los casos, seguidos de los antibióticos (22,2 %). Las formas clínicas más frecuentes se correspondieron con exantema (37,6 %), DRESS (14,5 %), y SSJ/NET (12,8 %).Un estudio retrospectivo realizado en Singapur[102] recogió los datos referentes a las reacciones adversas cutáneas graves (SSJ, NET y DRESS) de enero de 2007 a diciembre de 2011.…”
unclassified