2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0043933916000660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inositol - An effective growth promotor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to P, which also is released during phytate degradation and is known for its end-product inhibition effects on phytate degradation (Greiner et al, 1993 ; Angel et al, 2002 ; Olukosi and Fru-Nji, 2014 ; Shastak et al, 2014 ; Zeller et al, 2015b ). As reviewed by Lee and Bedford ( 2016 ), MI is thought to be involved in bone formation and bone mineral density in mice. This was not supported by the tibia ash data obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to P, which also is released during phytate degradation and is known for its end-product inhibition effects on phytate degradation (Greiner et al, 1993 ; Angel et al, 2002 ; Olukosi and Fru-Nji, 2014 ; Shastak et al, 2014 ; Zeller et al, 2015b ). As reviewed by Lee and Bedford ( 2016 ), MI is thought to be involved in bone formation and bone mineral density in mice. This was not supported by the tibia ash data obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no effects of MI supplementation on broiler performance were found in a study using a different broiler strain than that used in the present study (Linares et al, 2017 ). MI is involved in several signaling pathways that play roles in cell survival and growth, lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity (Huber, 2016 ; Lee and Bedford, 2016 ). Although the numerically low increase in G:F owing to the supplementation of MI was highly significant, further studies should be conducted to confirm this outcome and to investigate the metabolic mode of action of MI in the animal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement in FCR with xylanase addition was not seen when phytase was added at 1500 FTU/kg phytase. Super-dose levels of phytase are receiving more and more attention as high levels of phytase liberate more available P, energy and amino acids (Cowieson, Wilcock, and Bedford 2011), increase mineral bioavailability (Kies et al 2006), reduce phytate, thus reducing its anti-nutritional effect and increase myo-inositol (Lee and Bedford 2016;Woyengo, Weihrauch, and Nyachoti 2012) which has been shown to have numerous beneficial effects (Zyla et al 2004;Cowieson et al 2013). Feed conversion ratio was low and similar for super-dose levels of phytase irrespective of xylanase level suggesting that the super-dose level improved feed efficiency, thus there was no further scope for improvement with the addition of xylanase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For what concern feed additives, the administration of phytase in broiler diet is reported to have a direct effect on organic phosphorus (phytate) and mineral digestibility, but also an indirect effect on zootechnical performance and muscle development mainly through the release of myo-inositol [ 91 , 92 ]. Schmeisser et al [ 93 ] reported that the administration of a 6-microbial phytase in a moderately phosphorous-deficient diet determined significant changes in the expression levels of genes involved in muscle development through calmodulin/calcineurin and insulin-like growth factor pathways.…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%