2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2015.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inorganic heterocycles based on alumosilicate-sulfide ligand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such stabilization was informed by us previously for related species Al L {O-AlMe­(THF)}­{OSi­(O t Bu) 2 (μ-O)} (Scheme S2). In this case, a mixture of L H (δ = 4.89 ppm) and a new product with δ = 4.93 ppm for the proton γ was obtained (Figure S9). Importantly, the 1 H NMR spectrum of the crude product contains a singlet at δ = −0.59 ppm with an integral corresponding to one Al–Me group per 1 equiv of L , indicating that it could be IM1 ·THF.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such stabilization was informed by us previously for related species Al L {O-AlMe­(THF)}­{OSi­(O t Bu) 2 (μ-O)} (Scheme S2). In this case, a mixture of L H (δ = 4.89 ppm) and a new product with δ = 4.93 ppm for the proton γ was obtained (Figure S9). Importantly, the 1 H NMR spectrum of the crude product contains a singlet at δ = −0.59 ppm with an integral corresponding to one Al–Me group per 1 equiv of L , indicating that it could be IM1 ·THF.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Importantly, we have observed such methyl group migration previously, making this step feasible (Scheme S2). Although the reaction was performed in hexane where it is estimated that 99.995% of AlMe 3 exists as a Me 2 Al­(μ-Me) 2 AlMe 2 dimer, the presence of the silicate oxygen atoms of 1 guarantees that a significant quantity or all of AlMe 3 will be monomeric because of its coordination to the silicate moiety prior to the reaction . In an attempt to isolate IM1 or its derivative, we have performed a reaction between 1 and 0.8 equiv of AlMe 3 ; however, in the region of the γ proton of the ligand L in 1 H NMR, only the remaining 1 (δ = 4.97 ppm), the product 2 (δ = 4.87 ppm), and L H (δ = 4.89 ppm, formed by the decomposition of 1 ) were observed (Figure S6).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy, that compound 6 is the lighter homologue of the sulfur derivative LAl(m 3 -S)(AlMe 3 )(m-AlMe 2 )(m-O)Si[(m 3 -O)(AlMe 2 )]-(m-OtBu)(OtBu) reported earlier by our group. 11 The equimolar reaction of 2 with GaMe 3 resulted in the formation of [LAl(m-OH)(m-O)Si(m-O)(OtBu) 2 ]GaMe 2 (7) with 80% yield. The IR (ñ 3646 cm À1 ) and 1 H NMR spectra (d 1.53 ppm) of 7 conrm the presence of the Al(OH)Ga group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the polar M-O and M/O bond is 0.16 A for 6 and 0.25 A for 7. As the covalent radii of both elements are 11,18 The coordination of another aluminum atom to the silicate moiety in 5 and 6, results in a signicant strain release in the Al 2 SiO 3 ring, as the Al/Al distance increases from 3.057(1) A in 4 to 3.203(1) A in 5 and 3.206(1) A in 6, but is still shorter than in 3 3.332(1) A. Consequently, the conformation of the Al 2 SiO 3 ring changes from nearly planar (4) to boat (5) or a twisted chair (6) conformation. Furthermore, the coordination of three aluminum atoms to O (10)…”
Section: X-ray Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%