2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-010-9563-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inorganic carbon acquisition by eukaryotic algae: four current questions

Abstract: The phylogenetically and morphologically diverse eukaryotic algae are typically oxygenic photolithotrophs. They have a diversity of incompletely understood mechanisms of inorganic carbon acquisition: this article reviews four areas where investigations continue. The first topic is diffusive CO(2) entry. Most eukaryotic algae, like all cyanobacteria, have inorganic carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs). The ancestral condition was presumably the absence of a CCM, i.e. diffusive CO(2) entry, as found in a small… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some orders are known to lack pyrenoids (Dicytotales, Sphacelariales, Laminariales and Fucales) although they do appear to be able to use HCO À 3 [5]. Even though we find no positive selection in groups which are established as lacking CCMs (table 1 and electronic supplementary material, figure S3; the Rhodophyta genera Batrachospermum, Caloglossa, Membranoptera, Nitophyllum, Phycodrys and Ptilota [58 -60], and the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae [60,61]), the test used for this particular analysis is very conservative. This test averages positive selection across the group and was unable to detect positive selection, even within the Haptophyta and diatoms, in which positive selection is established when individual branches were tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, some orders are known to lack pyrenoids (Dicytotales, Sphacelariales, Laminariales and Fucales) although they do appear to be able to use HCO À 3 [5]. Even though we find no positive selection in groups which are established as lacking CCMs (table 1 and electronic supplementary material, figure S3; the Rhodophyta genera Batrachospermum, Caloglossa, Membranoptera, Nitophyllum, Phycodrys and Ptilota [58 -60], and the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae [60,61]), the test used for this particular analysis is very conservative. This test averages positive selection across the group and was unable to detect positive selection, even within the Haptophyta and diatoms, in which positive selection is established when individual branches were tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Different factors associated with low pH (elevated H + , elevated labile Al concentration, low concentration or absence of HCO 3 -, reduced solubility of quartz (Stumm & Morgan, 1996), different benthic macroinvertebrate taxon richness and feeding types (Larranaga et al, 2010)) all impact benthic algae, and discriminating between the effects of these factors on primary producers is difficult (Sparling & Lowe, 1996). Eukaryotic algae have developed a variety of mechanisms for inorganic carbon acquisition, including utilization of HCO 3 -and different carbon concentrating mechanisms (Raven, 2010). The observed maximum in non-diatom taxon richness around pH 6.4 is very close to the point where equilibrium concentrations of CO 2 and HCO 3 -in open water systems are equal (Stumm & Morgan, 1996), suggesting the coexistence of bicarbonate and CO 2 users.…”
Section: Effects Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This possibility has been suggested for certain diatoms but is still a matter of debate (Kroth et al, 2008;Raven, 2010). Some of the evidence used to support a C4 contribution to a diatom CCM has been shown not to apply to (a marine) Chlamydomonas (Reinfelder et al, 2004), and work on C. reinhardtii also agrees with the absence of C4-like photosynthesis (Harris, 1989;Raven, 2010). The absence of C4 photosynthesis is in agreement with the location of a potential C4 photosynthesis decarboxylase, PEPCK, in mitochondria ( Fig.…”
Section: Focus On Differences 3 H After Ccm Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%