2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inoculated microbial consortia perform better than single strains in living soil: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that inoculation of plants with microbial consortia is more effective than singlestrain in improving plant traits, supporting previous metadata studies [21,22]. A possible explanation for a larger effect of consortium than single strain inoculation can be due to the variable and synergistic plant growth-promoting activities that co-inoculation of more than one strain can offer to plants in comparison with single-strain inoculation.…”
Section: Biological Factors Influencing the Effect Sizesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We showed that inoculation of plants with microbial consortia is more effective than singlestrain in improving plant traits, supporting previous metadata studies [21,22]. A possible explanation for a larger effect of consortium than single strain inoculation can be due to the variable and synergistic plant growth-promoting activities that co-inoculation of more than one strain can offer to plants in comparison with single-strain inoculation.…”
Section: Biological Factors Influencing the Effect Sizesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, manipulation of plant microbiomes often does not result in the enhancement of plant traits, and the widespread application of this approach is limited by various biological and experimental factors that affect its efficiency [20]. Regarding biological factors, previous research has shown the advantage of multiple strains over single strain inoculation [21][22][23]. However, we still have a limited understanding of whether the efficiency of inoculation differs between a wide range of plant models and phenotypic traits, as well as applied microbial phyla.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After decades of research on plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and the development of microbial-based products to support plant health (25,26), the effectiveness of these products in the field remains largely uncertain (21)(22)(23)(24). Inoculants have recently incorporated microbial consortia to improve outcomes, but formulations lack ecological validation (20,25,26). Additionally, the study of microbial interactions and their impact on community functions are generally neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of microbial products in agriculture is a promising approach to aid plant health while reducing the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers (19). Notably, the use of microbial consortia allowed increased performance in laboratory settings, compared to single strains (20). However, scaling to field applications is still a limiting step (21)(22)(23)(24) probably due to the deficient incorporation of microbial ecology approaches in the development of multistrain products (25,26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent metanalysis showed that inoculant diversity correlates significantly and positively with inoculum effect (Liu et al, 2023). One explanation could be that more species in a consortium increase its multifunctionality and stability (Jiménez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%