Innovative Techniques: Siren or Rose

Galligan, Richard J.

doi:10.2307/351452

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the FES is described as a measure of whole family functioning because it is designed to capture the perceptions of individuals regarding the whole family system. However, family self-report instruments, such as the FES, do not capture interactive reality (Galligan, 1982).…”

Section: Conceptualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Points in Choosing Family Self‐Report Scales in Research

Dashiff

1994

Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Literature that systematically highlights critical decision-making points in conducting family research is sparse. The wide-spread use of self-report instruments in family research suggests that explication of decision-making points involved in the use of self-report instruments is needed. A specific instrument, the Family Environment Scale (Moos & Moos, 1986), is used to illustrate relevant decision-making. Conceptualization of a study, instrumentation, and data analysis are addressed.

show abstract

Section: Conceptualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Points in Choosing Family Self‐Report Scales in Research

Dashiff

1994

Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some clinicians do not require the formal support of empirical evidence to adopt and practice family therapy, though these clinicians can use such support to enhance the credibility of their practices. Other family theorists and family therapy advocates argue that the traditional methods of social scientists are inadequate to capture the essence of the family therapy enterprise (Galligan, 1982). Still other professionals are influenced by prominent reviewers and critics who emphasize the importance of empirical evidence in guiding the dissemination and proliferation of family therapy practice (Gurman & Kniskern, 1981).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%