Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference 2009
DOI: 10.4043/otc-20171-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Technique for Flowline Plug Remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the methane hydrate deposits are considered a future energy resource, they have been a risk for the energy industry when transporting hydrocarbon fluids through subsea flowlines operating at high pressure and low temperatures for deep and remote offshore fields. ,, Since Hammerschmidt suggested the occurrence of gas hydrates in gas transport pipelines with an equation for injecting methanol, the risk of hydrate formation in subsea flowlines was prevented by adding thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors (THIs) such as methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG). These thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors shift the hydrate equilibrium conditions toward lower temperatures and higher pressures, thus avoiding hydrate formation under flowline conditions. ,, However, the injection of THIs demands large infrastructure such as storage tanks, a complex regeneration process, injection pumps, and subsea distribution pipelines. Moreover, the presence of electrolyte ions in the formation water may induce operational issues such as scale deposition and MEG loss. As such, the oil and gas industry is seeking alternative solutions that are more efficient and offer economic benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the methane hydrate deposits are considered a future energy resource, they have been a risk for the energy industry when transporting hydrocarbon fluids through subsea flowlines operating at high pressure and low temperatures for deep and remote offshore fields. ,, Since Hammerschmidt suggested the occurrence of gas hydrates in gas transport pipelines with an equation for injecting methanol, the risk of hydrate formation in subsea flowlines was prevented by adding thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors (THIs) such as methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG). These thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors shift the hydrate equilibrium conditions toward lower temperatures and higher pressures, thus avoiding hydrate formation under flowline conditions. ,, However, the injection of THIs demands large infrastructure such as storage tanks, a complex regeneration process, injection pumps, and subsea distribution pipelines. Moreover, the presence of electrolyte ions in the formation water may induce operational issues such as scale deposition and MEG loss. As such, the oil and gas industry is seeking alternative solutions that are more efficient and offer economic benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors shift the hydrate equilibrium conditions toward lower temperatures and higher pressures, thus avoiding hydrate formation under flowline conditions. 1,6,7 However, the injection of THIs demands large infrastructure such as storage tanks, a complex regeneration process, injection pumps, and subsea distribution pipelines. Moreover, the presence of electrolyte ions in the formation water may induce operational issues such as scale deposition and MEG loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas hydrates are nonstoichiometric crystalline compounds in which water molecules encage gas molecules via hydrogen bonding under low temperature and high pressure conditions. Such conditions are found in subsea flowlines that transport hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, and propane with produced water to processing facilities. As the formation of gas hydrates in subsea flowlines may lead to solid blockages that cause costly production stoppages and remediation processes, the energy industry has been injecting alcohol- or glycol-based hydrate inhibitors into these lines to thermodynamically shift the hydrate formation conditions. Mono ethylene glycol (MEG) has been a popular choice of inhibitor for offshore gas fields due to its negligible loss to the hydrocarbon phase, while methanol has been used in offshore oil fields due to its low cost. However, these conventional inhibitors require a large infrastructure for storage with regeneration and high operational expenditures due to their large injection volume, which can be as high as 40–60 wt %, to the aqueous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are formed through hydrogen bonding between water molecules that enclathrate guest molecules at high pressures and low temperatures. These conditions are found in subsea oil and gas flowlines, as the production of offshore oil and gas fields have been moving into deeper and remote regions. Industry practice has relied on the injection of vast quantities of alcohol- or glycol-based thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors (THIs) to completely prevent hydrate formation in subsea flowlines; , however, handling large amounts of THI in remote offshore fields significantly increases the capital and operational expenditures, thereby adversely affecting the economics of field development. Consequently, hydrate prevention strategies are now moving toward hydrate risk management, through delaying nucleation of hydrate crystals, or the prevention of the agglomeration of the hydrate particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%