2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-0990-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials

Abstract: Thanks to their features, these methods represent a reliable way of ultimately improving paediatric care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These novel methods include sequential design, adaptive design, Bayesian approach, randomized withdrawal design, randomized placebo phase design and three-stage clinical trial, which go some way to overcome the limitations of small sample numbers and of the ethical acceptability of the trial [78]. Consideration of appropriate methods for a paediatric pharmacokinetic clinical study should involve the formulation, dose, route of administration, sampling interval and population.…”
Section: Paediatric Clinical Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These novel methods include sequential design, adaptive design, Bayesian approach, randomized withdrawal design, randomized placebo phase design and three-stage clinical trial, which go some way to overcome the limitations of small sample numbers and of the ethical acceptability of the trial [78]. Consideration of appropriate methods for a paediatric pharmacokinetic clinical study should involve the formulation, dose, route of administration, sampling interval and population.…”
Section: Paediatric Clinical Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that recruitment of such a trial population would be extremely difficult, there is a need to use innovative trial designs24. Some efficiency could be gained by adopting alternative study designs (Table 2).…”
Section: Opportunities For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional calculations showed a sample size of 16 total patients (eight per randomized group) would detect a difference of 50%, and a difference of 20% would require 80 total patients (40 per randomized group). An adaptive study design was planned a priori once preliminary data from the initial ten randomized patients demonstrated >50% difference in urine output, revealing adequate power would be achieved with only 20 randomized patients (10 per randomized group) (27, 28). Statistical analysis of data was performed with STATISTICA ™ software version 9 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%