2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Single-Armed Suture Technique for Microsurgical Vasoepididymostomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent series indicate that patency rates following VE range from 73% to 100%, depending on technique used and definition of vas patency. (Schiff et al, 2005;Monoski et al, 2007). Furthermore, looking at the published data more carefully, it becomes evident that in subgroup analysis for patients with obstructive intervals of <11 years, patency rates were as high as 80%, resulting in a pregnancy rate of 38% (Kolettis et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent series indicate that patency rates following VE range from 73% to 100%, depending on technique used and definition of vas patency. (Schiff et al, 2005;Monoski et al, 2007). Furthermore, looking at the published data more carefully, it becomes evident that in subgroup analysis for patients with obstructive intervals of <11 years, patency rates were as high as 80%, resulting in a pregnancy rate of 38% (Kolettis et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 The disadvantage is that the placement of two of the four needles on the vasal end has to be done in an outside-in fashion. Two 10-0 sutures are first placed on the vas in an outside-in fashion ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Robotic-assisted Microsurgical Vementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive studies have demonstrated the superiority of a two-layer or modified one-layer microsurgical anastomosis in humans [6-8], only a simple, single layer anastomosis was technically feasible in the very thin, proximal rat vas. One of the major difficulties in using the rat model for developing a vas autograft is the predilection of the rat to develop granulomas [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in microsurgical techniques during the past 30 years have improved the accuracy and success of vas-to-vas and vasoepididymal anastomoses. New modifications, such as the use of biomaterials/sealants, laser soldering, absorbable and nonabsorbable stents, new intussusception vasoepididymostomy (VE) anastomotic techniques, and robotics, are currently under investigation [5-8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%