2017
DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative scattering analysis shows that hydrophobic disordered proteins are expanded in water

Abstract: A substantial fraction of the proteome is intrinsically disordered, and even well-folded proteins adopt non-native geometries during synthesis, folding, transport, and turnover. Characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is challenging, in part because of a lack of accurate physical models and the difficulty of interpreting experimental results. We have developed a general method to extract the dimensions and solvent quality (self-interactions) of IDPs from a single small-angle x-ray scatteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
279
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
27
279
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of polymer-theoretic values of G to the smFRET inferred R ee results in R g 24-27Å for Sic1 and 26-29Å for pSic1 (SI Appendix Table S3 ). These inferred R g values are systematically smaller than those inferred from the SAXS dataset (see below), or from integrated ensemble modelling (see below), similar to previously reported discrepancies between smFRET and SAXS [27,34,35]. A model of chain statistics does not need to be specified, however, these methods are limited in describing IDPs and unfolded proteins [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Application of polymer-theoretic values of G to the smFRET inferred R ee results in R g 24-27Å for Sic1 and 26-29Å for pSic1 (SI Appendix Table S3 ). These inferred R g values are systematically smaller than those inferred from the SAXS dataset (see below), or from integrated ensemble modelling (see below), similar to previously reported discrepancies between smFRET and SAXS [27,34,35]. A model of chain statistics does not need to be specified, however, these methods are limited in describing IDPs and unfolded proteins [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, Riback and coworkers have recently introduced a procedure for fitting SAXS data by pregenerating ensembles of conformations with different properties (specifically, the strength and patterning of inter-residue attractions) and extracting dimensionless "molecular form factors" (MFFs) [34,38]. The properties of interest are then inferred from the ensemble whose MFF best fits the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After submission of our work, a novel method of analyzing small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments was published which also allows a scaling exponent to be determined from a single experiment 75 . An approach similar to the SAW- model should also be applicable to analyzing SAXS experiments to obtain both the scaling exponent and Rg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buffer subtraction, Guinier analysis and Kratky transformation was performed in Matlab (Mathworks). Final data was also fit to an empirically derived molecular form factor for unfolded proteins [31].…”
Section: Measurement Of Binding Affinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%