Innovative Power of Health Care Organisations Affects IT Adoption: A bi-National Health IT Benchmark Comparing Austria and Germany

Abstract

Multinational health IT benchmarks foster cross-country learning and have been employed at various levels, e.g. OECD and Nordic countries. A bi-national benchmark study conducted in 2007 revealed a significantly higher adoption of health IT in Austria compared to Germany, two countries with comparable healthcare systems. We now investigated whether these differences still persisted. We further studied whether these differences were associated with hospital intrinsic factors, i.e. the innovative power of the organisation and hospital demographics. We thus performed a survey to measure the "perceived IT availability" and the "innovative power of the hospital" of 464 German and 70 Austrian hospitals. The survey was based on a questionnaire with 52 items and was given to the directors of nursing in 2013/2014. Our findings confirmed a significantly greater IT availability in Austria than in Germany. This was visible in the aggregated IT adoption composite score "IT function" as well as in the IT adoption for the individual functions "nursing documentation" (OR = 5.98), "intensive care unit (ICU) documentation" (OR = 2.49), "medication administration documentation" (OR = 2.48), "electronic archive" (OR = 2.27) and "medication" (OR = 2.16). "Innovative power" was the strongest factor to explain the variance of the composite score "IT function". It was effective in hospitals of both countries but significantly more effective in Austria than in Germany. "Hospital size" and "hospital system affiliation" were also significantly associated with the composite score "IT function", but they did not differ between the countries. These findings can be partly associated with the national characteristics. Indicators point to a more favourable financial situation in Austrian hospitals; we thus argue that Austrian hospitals may possess a larger degree of financial freedom to be innovative and to act accordingly. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate the effect of "innovative power" in hospitals on health IT adoption in a bi-national health IT benchmark. We recommend directly including the financial situation into future regression models. On a political level, measures to stimulate the "innovative power" of hospitals should be considered to increase the digitalisation of healthcare.

Perceptions of Digital Health Education Among European Medical Students: Mixed Methods Survey

“…For instance, open source technologies have enabled low-cost dissemination and access to data and health information, telehealth technologies have offered communication channels for citizens and health care workers besides physical consultations, and nanotech products have been developed to improve diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 [ 7 ]. However, extensive and sustainable implementation of digital technologies, both into specific clinical settings [ 8 , 9 ] and into national health systems [ 4 , 10 , 11 ], has been advancing slowly.…”

All that Glitters is not Gold: Six Steps Before Selecting and Prioritizing e-Health Services

“…Moreover, it is important to mention that service selection and prioritization is but the first step to achieve a holistic impact assessment of e-health services. Additional research is needed to link other assessment approaches, such as for example for service operations, quality, and innovation [27,28], in order to gather insightful information about an e-health service along the entire service lifecycle.…”

Stand der Digitalisierung und des Technologieeinsatzes in deutschen Krankenhäusern

“…4 Innovationskraft. In einem Vergleich zwischen deutschen und österreichischen Krankenhäusern zeigte sich die subjektiv eingeschätzte Innovationskraft als der entscheidende Faktor, der zwischen Krankenhäuser mit viel und wenig IT diskriminierte und der die Unterschiede zwischen Deutschland und Österreich erklärte (Hüsers et al 2017 Diese Erkenntnisse verdeutlichen, dass Krankenhäuser Digitalisierung zu einem gewissen Anteil selbst in der Hand haben. Sie können sich weiterentwickeln, wenn sie ihre Stärken und Schwächen kennen und von anderen lernen können.…”