2019
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpz017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative investments, financial imperfections, and the Italian business cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the resources dedicated to innovation activities will tend to be more procyclical among financially constrained firms that among the financially unconstrained ones. The existing evidence supports this hypothesis, with French (Aghion et al , 2012), Slovenian (Bovha-Padilla et al , 2009), Italia (Bragoli et al , 2020) and Spanish (López-García et al , 2012) firm-level data, and with data from high-tech firms in the USA (Kabukcuoglu, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the resources dedicated to innovation activities will tend to be more procyclical among financially constrained firms that among the financially unconstrained ones. The existing evidence supports this hypothesis, with French (Aghion et al , 2012), Slovenian (Bovha-Padilla et al , 2009), Italia (Bragoli et al , 2020) and Spanish (López-García et al , 2012) firm-level data, and with data from high-tech firms in the USA (Kabukcuoglu, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Under the resource availability view, information asymmetries between managers and external investors will increase the costs of external finance and firms depend on internally generated funds to finance their innovation activity (Hall, 1992, 2002; Himmelberg and Petersen, 1994; Rafferty and Funk, 2008). The availability of internally generated funds will be greater in expansion than in recession, and so the resources dedicated to innovation will be procyclical (Wälde and Woitek, 2004; Barlevy, 2007; Ouyang, 2011; Fabrizio and Tsolomon, 2014; Archibugi et al , 2013; Kang et al , 2017; Sedgley et al , 2018; Bragoli et al , 2020; Nemlioglu and Mallick, 2020). The empirical evidence supports the procyclical evolution of innovation output with firm-level data (Geroski and Walters, 1995; Giedeman et al , 2006; Martinsson and Lf, 2009; Hingley and Park, 2017), although the results can differ, depending on whether the innovation output is a result of product or process innovations (Nickell et al , 2001; Berchicci et al , 2013; Hud and Rammer, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%