2021
DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7040244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Evaluation Techniques for Hanok Sustainability Based on Integrative Comfort Indices

Abstract: This study aims to present integrative evaluation techniques that can assess spatial comfort reflecting the unique value of a vernacular building type in Korea called Hanok. For this purpose, current evaluation indices and methods of official standards for normal building performance were analyzed through previous studies, since any certified tools for Hanok evaluation do not exist. This situation has made relevant markets to be deactivated, although Hanok has valuable meanings as the traditional architecture … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it is worth mentioning previous studies on vernacular construction housing concerning thermal comfort, demonstrating positive attributes of ancestral construction systems. [14] [12] [15]. Various parts of the world investigate vernacular architectural characteristics in different climatic zones and with diverse materials, including their physical, mechanical, and thermal properties, as well as location-specific design strategies [16] [17] [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is worth mentioning previous studies on vernacular construction housing concerning thermal comfort, demonstrating positive attributes of ancestral construction systems. [14] [12] [15]. Various parts of the world investigate vernacular architectural characteristics in different climatic zones and with diverse materials, including their physical, mechanical, and thermal properties, as well as location-specific design strategies [16] [17] [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%