2009
DOI: 10.1557/proc-1233-pp07-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Evaluation of Two Materials Science Education Enrichment Programs

Abstract: The Princeton Center for Complex Materials (PCCM) is an NSF-funded Materials Science and Research Center (MRSEC) at Princeton. PCCM currently has four Interdisciplinary Research Groups (IRGs) and several seed projects. PCCM runs a variety of education outreach programs that include: Research Experience for Undergraduates, Research Experience for Teachers, Materials Camp for Teachers, Middle School Science and Engineering Expo (SEE) for 1200 students, and Princeton University Materials Academy (PUMA), for inner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of Making Stuff at Princeton was part of an attempt to more rigorously collect data in our programs and further the work we have done in the past in evaluating one-day free-choice learning experiences such as the Science and Engineering Expo (SEE) [10]. The evaluation of Making Stuff for this project was based on the SEE evaluation, but improvements to the methodology were made, including the addition of group interviews and matching of preand post-responses.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of Making Stuff at Princeton was part of an attempt to more rigorously collect data in our programs and further the work we have done in the past in evaluating one-day free-choice learning experiences such as the Science and Engineering Expo (SEE) [10]. The evaluation of Making Stuff for this project was based on the SEE evaluation, but improvements to the methodology were made, including the addition of group interviews and matching of preand post-responses.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%