2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative analysis of a buried operating pipeline subjected to strike-slip fault movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to the design criteria of long-distance oil and gas pipelines [34], burial depths h=0.9m, 1.2m, 1.5m, 1.8m, and 2.1m were selected to analyze the influence of h on local buckling.…”
Section: Influence Of Burial Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the design criteria of long-distance oil and gas pipelines [34], burial depths h=0.9m, 1.2m, 1.5m, 1.8m, and 2.1m were selected to analyze the influence of h on local buckling.…”
Section: Influence Of Burial Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parametric study was also conducted to study the effects of various fault crossing angles (β), properties of soil-pipe interface and operational conditions such as internal pipe pressure and temperature variations on buried pipelines crossing normal faults. Banushi et al (2018) performed a parametric study to investigate the behaviour of buried continuous pipelines crossing strike-slip faults. A new technique called submodelling technique was proposed to capture behaviour of pipelines at the pipe sections prone to local buckling.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for numerical methods, finite element analyses (FEAs) have been extensively employed, which typically fall into two categories: (1) beam-type elements for pipe and discrete multidirectional nonlinear soil springs for soil (ASCE, 1984; Honegger and Nyman, 2017; Liu et al, 2004; O’Rourke et al, 2008), (2) shell elements for pipe and three-dimensional continuum solid elements for soil (Banushi et al, 2018; Jung et al, 2013a, 2013b; O’ROURKE, 2010; Rasouli and Fatahi, 2020; Vazouras and Karamanos, 2017; Vazouras et al, 2015, 2010; Xie et al, 2011). The former method is widely adopted in engineering practice because of its simplicity in modeling and simulation process, and low computational cost while maintaining an acceptable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%