Abstract:Cluster policies are but one of the most well-known policy tools tosteer innovation in the realm of science and technology policy. While there is much research on the effects of cluster based funding for innovation and scholarly strategies, little is said about its emergence, its legitimation and its situatedness in societal discourses and professional practices. This article applies an 'instrument constituencies' perspective on cluster policies in science and innovation. Drawing on the case of Germany, it is … Show more
“…Cluster policies can vary in scope and design, but they generally refer to a particular model and conceptual repertoire which is rooted in innovation studies. Consequently, they rely on a ”functional model of governance” established in the academic literature (Blümel 2021 ). Cluster policy combines its instruments in an innovative and cluster-focused way (Ahn 2018 ) and has emerged as an archetype for a group of “soft” policies that aim to achieve relational outcomes (Burfitt and MacNeill 2008 ).…”
Section: Cluster Policies On the Waysidementioning
Facing increasing interregional and international competition, the need for innovating economic and socio-institutional structures is virulent. One possibility is establishing clusters to promote the idea that developing a network of companies with a mix of cooperative and competitive practices leads to competitive advantages for the respective area. Organizing clusters means developing a cluster culture, a communication strategy and a selection criterion for creating the desired mix of companies. We base our opinion paper on an extensive literature review of scientific sources about clusters, cluster policy and Place Leadership. We reveal that the prevailing cluster policy often does not lead to sustainably successful clusters. We conclude that we need a shared vision among cluster members to develop resilient clusters. Shared visions create a sense of belonging, social identity, and internalization of values and attitudes. This way, it is possible that a sustainable and trust-oriented network structure can develop, and knowledge spillovers within the cluster, necessary for resilient clusters, can occur. True Place Leadership is crucial to deal with the needed diversity of actors and stakeholders, some of whom are in competition, inspiring, motivating, and guiding shared, cooperative, and collaborative ways of working. Employing Place Leadership can outperform current policy measures in other regional, industrial and structural areas and might even make them redundant.
“…Cluster policies can vary in scope and design, but they generally refer to a particular model and conceptual repertoire which is rooted in innovation studies. Consequently, they rely on a ”functional model of governance” established in the academic literature (Blümel 2021 ). Cluster policy combines its instruments in an innovative and cluster-focused way (Ahn 2018 ) and has emerged as an archetype for a group of “soft” policies that aim to achieve relational outcomes (Burfitt and MacNeill 2008 ).…”
Section: Cluster Policies On the Waysidementioning
Facing increasing interregional and international competition, the need for innovating economic and socio-institutional structures is virulent. One possibility is establishing clusters to promote the idea that developing a network of companies with a mix of cooperative and competitive practices leads to competitive advantages for the respective area. Organizing clusters means developing a cluster culture, a communication strategy and a selection criterion for creating the desired mix of companies. We base our opinion paper on an extensive literature review of scientific sources about clusters, cluster policy and Place Leadership. We reveal that the prevailing cluster policy often does not lead to sustainably successful clusters. We conclude that we need a shared vision among cluster members to develop resilient clusters. Shared visions create a sense of belonging, social identity, and internalization of values and attitudes. This way, it is possible that a sustainable and trust-oriented network structure can develop, and knowledge spillovers within the cluster, necessary for resilient clusters, can occur. True Place Leadership is crucial to deal with the needed diversity of actors and stakeholders, some of whom are in competition, inspiring, motivating, and guiding shared, cooperative, and collaborative ways of working. Employing Place Leadership can outperform current policy measures in other regional, industrial and structural areas and might even make them redundant.
“…Durch die unterschiedlichsten Methoden -seien sie natur-oder sozialwissenschaftlich -werden überregionale Erwartungen generiert, kommuniziert, objektiviert und mit regionalen Erfahrungen abgeglichen. In einer historischen Rekonstruktion zeigt Clemens Blümel, dass regionale Innovationspolitiken wie die Förderung von Unternehmensclustern sowohl durch wissenschaftspolitische als auch durch politökonomische Kontexte legitimiert werden (Blümel 2020). Für die Forschungspraxis gilt unabhängig von ökonomischen, ökologischen oder soziologischen Absichten: Regionale Forschungsvorhaben fungieren oft als Schnittstelle eines Prozesses, der Landstriche in Zentrum und Peripherie teilt und den überregionalen Zugriff von Politik und Wirtschaft ermöglicht.…”
“…The legitimacy of an innovation in a group or community shows that it cannot be separated from the contribution made to support it (Blümel, 2020). The form of citizen trust is in the form of citizen involvement in the collaborative development of various types of scientific, professional and practical knowledge related to social needs implemented in digital innovation.…”
Section: Citizen Trust In Implementing Digital and Green Innovative Strategymentioning
The unit of analysis in this study is local government data from Indonesia. The goal of this research is to identify the impact of fiscal stress and citizen trust on digital and green innovation strategies. This study also seeks to as certain the impact of digital and green innovation strategies on the impact of fiscal stress and citizen trust on sustainable financial performance. This research uses a descriptive verification method in conjunction with a quantitative approach. Path analysis is an analytical method used in the processing of statistical data. The research samples in this study are 148 Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) from East Java Province. The tests showed that fiscal pressure and citizen trust have a significant impact on digital and green innovation strategies. The test results also show that fiscal stress and digital and green innovation strategies have a significant effect on sustainable financial performance, whereas citizen trust has no significant effect on sustainable financial performance. Simultaneously, digital and green innovation strategy are critical for mitigating the impact of fiscal stress and increasing citizens' trust sustainable financial performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.