Innovations in ‘African solutions to African problems’: the evolving practice of regional peacekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Three critical trends in the evolving practice of regional peacekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa have undermined the usefulness of the common conceptual dichotomy between regional peacekeeping and UN/global peacekeeping. First, sub-Saharan African states have distanced themselves from long-term autonomous regional peacekeeping, and currently favour explicitly interim missions that are a prelude rather than an alternative to UN peacekeeping. Second, the analytically clear line between regional peacekeeping and the separate sub-Saharan African tradition of solidarity deployments (i.e. military support of embattled governments) has in practice become blurred, and the regional vs global peacekeeping dichotomy not only fails to acknowledge this trend but helps to obscure it. Finally, sub-Saharan African states are increasingly addressing regional conflicts by participating in UN operations deployed in the region. UN peacekeeping has thus emerged as a preferred form of regional peacekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa.

Human Security in East Africa: The Eac's Illusive Quest for Inclusive Citizenship

“…They are the overtly crucial component to the successful functioning of the AU's African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), having been enshrined in the AU constitution (AU, Art 3(I)). Regional Organisations also compliment the 'African Solutions to African Problems' discourse which re-emerged post-2000 (Coleman 2011). Despite a perception of EAC as an economic community that was not explicitly founded under a security mandate, security and defence was not only a key component to the revival of the federation but a driving force.…”

Institutional Justice as a Condition for the Regional Acceptance of Global Order: The African Union and the Protection of Civilians

“…The AU would largely be dependent on extracontinental actors for critical capabilities such as reconnaissance and air transport. Rather than adhering to the policy of independent action, observers advise the AU to either limit itself to short-term missions that can eventually be handed over to the UN or to actively assume a part in UN operations (Coleman 2011). Moreover, the AU and subregional organizations have been accepting of the trend towards more robust and independent approaches to UN missions in Africa.…”

Boko Haram, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, al-Shabaab – Similarities and Differences

“…27 Al-Shabaab's main religious and political goals were to support global Jihad, and -on the "national" level -to establish a society based on its rigid interpretation of Sharīʿah law, to create a separate Islamic state incorporating all parts of "Greater Somalia" -the land where ethnic Somalis have historically ever lived (Somalia, Eastern Djibouti, Eastern Kenya, Ogaden and the Haud in Ethiopia). 28 Al-Shabaab controls parts of Somalia's Southern and Central regions. The composition of the organisation is multi-ethnic, with its leadership positions mainly occupied by Somalis, some of whom were trained in Afghanistan.…”