Innovation systems in the European periphery: the policy approaches of Ireland and Greece

Abstract

In this paper, we chart the historical evolution of the national innovation systems of Ireland and Greece, under the light of contemporaneous economic, technological and institutional developments. We argue that, among other things, the drafting of policy and the consequent shaping of their institutions has been an important delineator. We observe that importing solutions from abroad, with Greece looking to Brussels andIreland to the USA, was central to their respective experiences. We conclude that effective innovation policy must also take into account of novel, context-specific approaches to governance.

Learning by firms: the black box of South Africa's innovation system

“…In Europe, Ireland's relative success in becoming a more knowledge-intensive economy was owed in part to the appropriate customisation of policy in the context of a pragmatic contextualisation of opportunities afforded by external forces. By contrast, Greece's attempt to simply import solutions from Brussels to address national problems was largely a failure (Collins and Pontikakis, 2006).…”

The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level

“…On these higher levels, the primary aim of a significant number of studies is to analyze and compare different innovation systems and formulate policy recommendations to improve the performance of the innovation system(s) under study (e.g. Collins and Pontikakis, 2006;Martin and Moodysson, 2013;Park and Lee, 2005). The performance is either judged on the ability to perform seven supporting functions: entrepreneurial activities, knowledge development, knowledge diffusion, guidance of the search, market formation, resources mobilization and creation of legitimacy (e.g.…”

Tales of Emergence—Synthetic Biology as a Scientific Community in the Making

“…Fujimura (2000) has argued, using the case of translational genomics, that national context is significant in that such context changes the production of knowledge in biology in important ways. Thus our study of the way in which a potential scientific discipline emerges needs to maintain a sense of place, as evolving structures depend on local and national contingencies (Collins and Pontikakis, 2006). The emergence of a community of practices is not a global process (even though it can be made to become a global process).…”