2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
69
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Vernengo rightly points at the two different coexisting traditions in dependency theory, while he underscores that both groups would agree that at the core of the dependency relationship between centre and periphery lies the inability of the periphery to develop an autonomous and dynamic process of technological innovation (2006, p. 552 Lundvall et al (2009). See also Metcalfe and Ramlogan (2008). 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vernengo rightly points at the two different coexisting traditions in dependency theory, while he underscores that both groups would agree that at the core of the dependency relationship between centre and periphery lies the inability of the periphery to develop an autonomous and dynamic process of technological innovation (2006, p. 552 Lundvall et al (2009). See also Metcalfe and Ramlogan (2008). 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009, p. 1). In practice, this commitment is often taken up with the idea of 'closing the gap' between poor and rich countries by expanding poorer countries' gross domestic products (GDPs) and, generally, the 'catching-up' approach favoured by the so-called Washington Consensus, which Lundvall et al aim at overcoming (Metcalfe and Ramlogan 2008). It is true that NISs helped to move beyond the neoliberal ideas of the Washington Consensus that strive towards increasing international competitiveness, a diminished role of the state, lowered wages and currency devaluations (Lundvall 2005, p. 6).…”
Section: National Innovation Systems and The Critique Of Their Reificmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The great strength of the innovation systems approach is the focus on the role of non-market institutions and processes in fostering innovation (Metcalfe & Ramlogan, 2006). Increases in service complexity and required knowledge have led to innovations that are multifaceted, requiring suitable communications channels to share and exchange information and knowledge.…”
Section: Exploration Of Actors' Tacit Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its proponents have claimed that the differences in economic and technological performance of individual states are given by the combination of institutions present and their interactions. Innovation performance depends on the institutional differences in the introduction, development, and diffusion of new technologies, products, and processes (Metcalfe & Ramlogan, 2008). In recent years, the innovation systems concept has become the primary approach in research into innovations (Kaufmann, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%