Innovation Research on Symbiotic Relationship of Organization’s Tacit Knowledge Transfer Network

Abstract

The sustainable development of organizations is inseparable from innovation, and tacit knowledge is the core resource used to achieve organizational innovation. Due to the implicitness of tacit knowledge and the complexity of members’ relationships, symbiotic relationships between members have dramatically affected the transfer effect of tacit knowledge. However, previous studies on tacit knowledge transfer only focus on the characteristics of the subject or object; fewer consider the role of symbiotic relationships between knowledge subjects. An organization’s tacit knowledge transfer network (OTKTN) is a dynamic knowledge transfer network established among multiple members. Tacit knowledge transfer and sharing among network members conform to the symbiotic feature. To examine various relationships between members, and to investigate the mechanisms that impact tacit knowledge transfer, this article aims to analyze the symbiotic relationships in OTKTN based on the symbiotic perspective. The Lotka–Volterra model was used to construct symbiotic evolution model, and symbiotic coefficients were constructed from the four levels: knowledge-based psychological personal ownership (KPPO) of the knowledge provider, media richness, trust of the knowledge receiver, and organizational rewards matching, to discuss symbiotic modes. Finally, numerical simulation software was applied to simulate the evolution of knowledge levels in members. The results show that the four kinds of symbiotic modes between members include independence, commensalism, asymmetric mutualism, and symmetric mutualism. Symmetric mutualism is the best mode. In this mode, maximum level in independence mode affects the final stable knowledge level; the initial knowledge amount and natural growth rate both affect knowledge growth rate. Media richness, receiver’s trust, and organizational rewards matching can increase members’ tacit knowledge, but the knowledge provider’s KPPO inhibits members’ tacit knowledge growth. This article provides guidance to form a healthy symbiotic relationship and help organizations increase tacit knowledge.

Assessing production–living–ecological spaces and its urban–rural gradients in Xiangyang City, China: insights from land-use function symbiosis

“…Symbiosis theory is an emerging science that investigates the formation of synergistic evolutionary structures of complex systems (Silvana et al, 2019) and has been applied to industrial development (Sokka et al, 2015), land-marine economy (Di et al, 2017), and organizational development (Xu et al, 2022). However, literature on the symbiotic interaction between LUFs in the PLES is scarce.…”

“…Symbiosis is a state in which different species mutually reinforce and coexist harmoniously under speci c circumstances (Silvana et al, 2019). The symbiosis system is comprised of symbiotic unit, substrate, media, environment, and mode (Munzi, et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2022). The symbiotic unit is the primary material condition for forming a symbiotic body, and its information, matter, and energy de ne the symbiotic substrate.…”

How to promote knowledge transfer within R&D team? An evolutionary game based on prospect theory

“…Furthermore, from the perspective of the "dual" scenario of knowledge transfer, Galbraith (1990), Ramanadhan (2009), Rutten (2016), Zhou (2015), and Liu (2018) pointed out that the geographical distance, psychological distance, and knowledge distance among the participants (individuals or enterprises) play an important role in knowledge transfer performance, and their effects on explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge are quite different [21][22][23][24][25]. From the perspective of "network" scenarios, Greenaway (2015), Zhou (2008), Xu (2018), and Xu (2017) argued that the structure of the social network formed by individuals(e.g., strong connection, weak connection, network centrality, network structure holes, and network density) play a vital role on knowledge transfer performance [16, [26][27][28].…”