Meat Quality Analysis 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819233-7.00021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation in sensory assessment of meat and meat products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, flash profiling has also been applied for the sensory analysis of meat products such as hams or hot dogs. The results derived from Flash Profile were comparable to those obtained applying quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) [24]. Flash Profile demonstrated an efficient discriminant ability between a traditional Madagascar meat product elaborated with pork and beef and a traditional Portuguese sausage [69].…”
Section: Sensory Analysis As Tool For the Development Of New Meat Prosupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this sense, flash profiling has also been applied for the sensory analysis of meat products such as hams or hot dogs. The results derived from Flash Profile were comparable to those obtained applying quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) [24]. Flash Profile demonstrated an efficient discriminant ability between a traditional Madagascar meat product elaborated with pork and beef and a traditional Portuguese sausage [69].…”
Section: Sensory Analysis As Tool For the Development Of New Meat Prosupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The test allows for a comparison between all the samples presented at the same time, but it is not suitable if the samples have to be previously prepared [ 23 ]. Napping is usually combined with other sensory tests, for example, with Ultra Flash Profile, where participants can write down the properties that they consider best describe the samples, in this way, extra qualitative information is provided to the analysis [ 24 ].…”
Section: New Sensory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the consumers rated their overall liking using a 9-point hedonic scale ranging from 1 = dislike extremely -9 = like extremely (Peryam & Pilgrim, 1957). Subsequently, they selected the attributes they considered appropriate for describing the target sample and then rated its applicability using a 5point scale, with anchors at 1 = slightly applicable and 5 = very applicable (Varela & Ares, 2016;Ventanas, González-Mohino, Estévez, & Carvalho, 2020). The attributes (smoky, crunchy, salty, soft, bright, fatty, dry, hard, rancid, woody, succulent and fibrous) were selected based on previous studies in the same product category (Saldaña et al, 2018;Saldaña, Saldarriaga, Cabrera, Behrens, et al, 2019;Saldaña, Saldarriaga, Cabrera, Siche, et al, 2019) and were presented following a Williams'…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%