Innovation in Pain Rehabilitation Using Co-Design Methods During the Development of a Relapse Prevention Intervention: Case Study

Abstract

Background Many intervention development projects fail to bridge the gap from basic research to clinical practice. Instead of theory-based approaches to intervention development, co-design prioritizes the end users’ perspective as well as continuous collaboration between stakeholders, designers, and researchers throughout the project. This alternative approach to the development of interventions is expected to promote the adaptation to existing treatment activities and to be responsive to the requirements of end users. Objective The first objective was to provide an overview of all activities that were employed during the course of a research project to develop a relapse prevention intervention for interdisciplinary pain treatment programs. The second objective was to examine how co-design may contribute to stakeholder involvement, generation of relevant insights and ideas, and incorporation of stakeholder input into the intervention design. Methods We performed an embedded single case study and used the double diamond model to describe the process of intervention development. Using all available data sources, we also performed deductive content analysis to reflect on this process. Results By critically reviewing the value and function of a co-design project with respect to idea generation, stakeholder involvement, and incorporation of stakeholder input into the intervention design, we demonstrated how co-design shaped the transition from ideas, via concepts, to a prototype for a relapse prevention intervention. Conclusions Structural use of co-design throughout the project resulted in many different participating stakeholders and stimulating design activities. As a consequence, the majority of the components of the final prototype can be traced back to the information that stakeholders provided during the project. Although this illustrates how co-design facilitates the integration of contextual information into the intervention design, further experimental testing is required to evaluate to what extent this approach ultimately leads to improved usability as well as patient outcomes in the context of clinical practice.

Developing a Provincial Surveillance and Support System for Childhood Cancer Survivors: Multiphase User-Centered Design Study

“…This study adds to the growing literature on the design of interventions using user-centered methodology and behavioral [34][35][36][37][38] and psychological [39,40] theory. As per our experience, we found these 2 methodologies to be compatible and beneficial.…”

Designing A Provincial Surveillance and Support System for Childhood Cancer Survivors

“…This study adds to the growing literature on the design of interventions using user-centered methodology and behavioral (27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and psychological (32,33)theory. According to our experience, we found using these two methodologies are compatible and bene cial.…”

Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: A qualitative study on the experiences of clients and clinicians in working with a practical tool

“…In the future implementation of the tool, we recommend involving all team members at an early stage, to remove implementation barriers and to increase support for working with the tool. The application of a knowledge translation framework 18 and practical techniques such as co-design 19 may help to change the behavior of rehabilitation clinicians.…”