Innovation Happens Elsewhere 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-155860889-4/50004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation Happens Elsewhere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For organizations that are trying to avoid SPL's underlying costs (platform and asset base), open innovation strategies have become critical for survival [3]. Thus, the platform started to become available for outside parties, starting the transition to SECO -considered the fourth generation of software reuse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For organizations that are trying to avoid SPL's underlying costs (platform and asset base), open innovation strategies have become critical for survival [3]. Thus, the platform started to become available for outside parties, starting the transition to SECO -considered the fourth generation of software reuse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key difference between Open Source and Inner Source is that the resulting software in Inner Source is proprietary, and as such, has no Open-Source license [Goldman and Gabriel 2005]. Of course, organizations may alter their software marketing strategy over time and make the software that was produced as an Inner Source project available as an open-source project, a phenomenon that has been termed Opensourcing [Ågerfalk and Fitzgerald 2008].…”
Section: Hewlettpackardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different organizations and authors have used different terminology to refer to the adoption of OSS development principles. Besides the term "Inner Source" used in this paper, other terms for this phenomenon are "Progressive Open Source" and "Controlled Source" [Dinkelacker et al 2002], "Corporate Source" [Goldman and Gabriel 2005], "Corporate Open Source" [Gurbani et al 2006], and "Internal Open Source" [Goldman and Gabriel 2005;Vitharana et al 2010].…”
Section: Hewlettpackardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What makes a resource open is that it can be widely accessed and used. For example, what makes source code ''open'' is its public accessibility (Gacek and Arief, 2004;Goldman and Gabriel, 2005), while what makes APIs ''open'' is that they can be accessed and used by anyone (Benlian et al, 2015;Boudreau, 2012). In short, openness here primarily means accessibility, with transparency implied as people cannot access what is hidden from them.…”
Section: Topics Of Research On Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%