Innovation for geriatric care with an academic-practice model

Malcolm, Millicent; Shellman, Julliette; Rees, Catherine

doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.03.006

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Over a quarter of the articles reported on IPCP interventions in the Netherlands ( n = 4) and Canada ( n = 4), whilst the remaining articles reported on IPCP interventions in the United States ( n = 3), Switzerland ( n = 1), Sweden ( n = 1) and Australia ( n = 1). Of note, only one of the IPCP teams was identified specifically as an “IPCP team” (Malcolm, Shellman, Elwell, et al, 2017; Malcolm, Shellman, Rees, 2017). Other terms referring to the teams included “multidisciplinary team,” “interdisciplinary team,” “interprofessional student clinic” or “integrated care” team (Faul et al, 2009; Kent et al, 2016; Looman et al, 2016; Spoorenberg et al, 2018).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and facilitators to interprofessional collaborative practice for community‐dwelling older adults: An integrative review

Montano

Cornell

Gravenstein

2021

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and Objectives The aim of this integrative review was to synthesise empirical reports of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) for community‐dwelling older adults and uncover barriers and facilitators related to its success as a model of care for this population. Background IPCP is a model of care that has demonstrated positive outcomes for community‐dwelling older adults. However, a summary of barriers and facilitators to IPCP models has not been presented. Methods An integrative review using the method posited by Whittemore and Knafl was completed to identify barriers and facilitators to IPCP for community‐dwelling older adults. The literature search was reported following PRISMA guidelines. Results Four themes emerged as barriers to IPCP: (1) A (Potential) Logistical Nightmare, (2) All About the Money, (3) If We Can't Test It, Can We Recommend It? and (4) Challenging for the Team, Challenging for the Client. Three themes emerged as facilitators to IPCP: (1) Reducing Resource Waste, (2) The “C” in IPCP and (3) What Matters Most. Conclusions IPCP models for community‐dwelling older adults must adapt to the setting of care and client needs. Interprofessional education opportunities for team members facilitate effective IPCP. Healthcare policies and funding structures need to address IPCP for community‐dwelling older adults for this model to be successful and sustainable. Relevance to Clinical Practice Nurses participate on and lead IPCP teams caring for community‐dwelling older adults and, therefore, need to be aware of barriers and facilitators to this model of care.

show abstract