2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation: Development of a Virtual Radiation Oncologist Consultation Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AP activities collected were diverse and from every time-point of a typical radiation therapy patient care pathway: 1) triage, 2) new patient consultation: obtaining consent, physical exam, 3) treatment planning: technical consultation for planning, delineation of target, organ-at-risk (OAR) or field placement, 4) treatment delivery: image assessment, and 5) weekly review or follow up visits. The APRTs also provided a list of activities performed under a medical directive: ordering diagnostic imaging, lab work and medications independently and conducting virtual new patient consultations for patients that live from a distant from their cancer centre [15] . Finally the brachytherapy APRTs listed AP activities they performed in the brachytherapy patient care pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AP activities collected were diverse and from every time-point of a typical radiation therapy patient care pathway: 1) triage, 2) new patient consultation: obtaining consent, physical exam, 3) treatment planning: technical consultation for planning, delineation of target, organ-at-risk (OAR) or field placement, 4) treatment delivery: image assessment, and 5) weekly review or follow up visits. The APRTs also provided a list of activities performed under a medical directive: ordering diagnostic imaging, lab work and medications independently and conducting virtual new patient consultations for patients that live from a distant from their cancer centre [15] . Finally the brachytherapy APRTs listed AP activities they performed in the brachytherapy patient care pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of the service resulted in significant time and cost savings for these patients residing, on average, 600 km outside of the Local Health Integration Network (LHIN). [15] It was also identified that there is a distinct skillset and competencies required to conduct virtual patient interactions compared to those conducted in-person. [20] , [21] To ensure patient safety, additional training is required for the use of new technology and a modified approach to virtual assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recognized leaders on the pRT team and beyond, pCSRTs can influence jurisdictions to achieve necessary changes and improvements in practice/processes, as demonstrated by pCSRTs' research and knowledge translation, academic contribution, and stakeholder experiences [6,12,14,18,21,[27][28][29][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Table 3 summarizes the metrics used by pCSRTs to illustrate their influence, along with the methodology used to gather information.…”
Section: Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this was demonstrated by a pCSRT at a large academic cancer center in Ontario, who implemented the use of videoconferencing technology for patients diagnosed with brain and/or oligo-metastases for SBRT consultations with an RO. The videoconferencing demonstrated many benefits including a savings of seven hours of transportation time and $100 per patient, as well as saving clinic space using a virtual environment 37 .…”
Section: Enhanced Access To Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This virtual consultation process has provided equivalent, safe, and timely care, and enhanced access to SBRT services for geographically distant patients diagnosed with brain metastases, oligometastatic disease, and early-stage lung cancer 37 . Ongoing research will help reveal further costs and benefits to a health system, compare outcomes, and assess the acceptability of the approach by patients.…”
Section: Enhanced Access To Carementioning
confidence: 99%