2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation determinants over industry life cycle

Abstract: This paper analyzes how the influence of firm-level innovation determinants varies over the industry life cycle. Two sets of determinants are distinguished: (1) determinants of a firm's innovation propensity, i.e. the likelihood of being innovative and (2) determinants of its innovation intensity, i.e. innovation sales. By combining the literature emphasizing firms' internal resources (micro level) with the research strand on the role of the industry context (mesolevel), the paper develops hypotheses about the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In-house R&D indirectly helps the firm to exploit externally available scientific knowledge from collaborators (Vega-Jurado et al, 2008;Alvarez et al, 2009;De Jong & von Hippel, 2009;Love et al, 2011). Such external technological opportunities induce investment in R&D because there is a positive correlation between absorptive capacity, innovativeness and R&D intensity (Vega-Jurado et al, 2008;Tavassoli, 2015). According to Mansury and Love (2008) and Freel (2005), service sector firms are more likely to develop innovations in collaboration with customers and suppliers by emphasising the collaborative interactions, while firms in manufacturing tend to develop their in-house R&D and linkages with universities.…”
Section: Stream 1: Internal Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-house R&D indirectly helps the firm to exploit externally available scientific knowledge from collaborators (Vega-Jurado et al, 2008;Alvarez et al, 2009;De Jong & von Hippel, 2009;Love et al, 2011). Such external technological opportunities induce investment in R&D because there is a positive correlation between absorptive capacity, innovativeness and R&D intensity (Vega-Jurado et al, 2008;Tavassoli, 2015). According to Mansury and Love (2008) and Freel (2005), service sector firms are more likely to develop innovations in collaboration with customers and suppliers by emphasising the collaborative interactions, while firms in manufacturing tend to develop their in-house R&D and linkages with universities.…”
Section: Stream 1: Internal Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosi et al, 1990;Soete, 1987;Verspagen and Wakelin, 1997). Recent approaches have been carried out from new perspectives, such as the industry life cycle (Tavassoli, 2015). In general, there is a consensus that technology-intensive sectors export more than other sectors, and therefore, the sector variable, along with other firm characteristics, is usually included as a control variable to take into account factors that can affect firm export behaviour (e.g.…”
Section: Innovation and Trade: The General Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and managerial characteristics of firms. We still have a limited understanding of the long-term determinants of the innovation behavior of firms including their investments in different types of innovation, such as products, processes, organization and markets (Tavassoli, 2015). To increase our understanding of these issues, we in this paper try to answer the following five related questions: Is innovation persistent at the firm level?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%