“…The role of business is well established in theories of urban politics (Molotch 1976; Stone 1989), and these articles address how and to what effect business takes part in urban policy processes. They also reveal—in line with research on the postindustrial city—that stable business–government coalitions are no longer found (Stone 2015) because business is either involved in the short term only (Hinze and Smith 2020) or is, in fact, not involved at all (Bramwell 2020). For example, Bramwell (2020) compares local coalitions formed to address adaptation to the digital economy.…”
Section: Diverse Actors and The Role Of Institutions In Participationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…They also reveal—in line with research on the postindustrial city—that stable business–government coalitions are no longer found (Stone 2015) because business is either involved in the short term only (Hinze and Smith 2020) or is, in fact, not involved at all (Bramwell 2020). For example, Bramwell (2020) compares local coalitions formed to address adaptation to the digital economy. Ironically for an economic development policy area, she finds that the private sector is least involved in coalitions compared to government and foundations, universities, and other nonprofit organizations.…”
Section: Diverse Actors and The Role Of Institutions In Participationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The authors in this symposium explore these three proposed key dimensions of urban policy making. The contributions include cases in which cities actively make policies in the absence of, complementary to, or opposed against policies at other governmental levels, such as migration (Bazurli 2020; Williamson 2020) and digitization (Bramwell 2020). They analyze more conventional urban policy fields such as housing (Donaghy 2020) and large-scale infrastructure development (Hinze and Smith 2020), with fresh insights about the contemporary moment.…”
Section: Articles In the Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She isolates which federal immigration policies are most present in cities and shows that local officials craft different types of local immigration policies if they experience welcoming or punitive national policy. Bramwell (2020) explores both the opportunities for multilevel politics and the constraints of hierarchy. She examines whether sector-specific policy silos, levels of government, and state and societal divides can be bridged in the case of “ordinary cities” trying to cope with the disruptive potential of digital economic transformations.…”
Section: All Policy Making Is Multilevelmentioning
“…The role of business is well established in theories of urban politics (Molotch 1976; Stone 1989), and these articles address how and to what effect business takes part in urban policy processes. They also reveal—in line with research on the postindustrial city—that stable business–government coalitions are no longer found (Stone 2015) because business is either involved in the short term only (Hinze and Smith 2020) or is, in fact, not involved at all (Bramwell 2020). For example, Bramwell (2020) compares local coalitions formed to address adaptation to the digital economy.…”
Section: Diverse Actors and The Role Of Institutions In Participationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…They also reveal—in line with research on the postindustrial city—that stable business–government coalitions are no longer found (Stone 2015) because business is either involved in the short term only (Hinze and Smith 2020) or is, in fact, not involved at all (Bramwell 2020). For example, Bramwell (2020) compares local coalitions formed to address adaptation to the digital economy. Ironically for an economic development policy area, she finds that the private sector is least involved in coalitions compared to government and foundations, universities, and other nonprofit organizations.…”
Section: Diverse Actors and The Role Of Institutions In Participationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The authors in this symposium explore these three proposed key dimensions of urban policy making. The contributions include cases in which cities actively make policies in the absence of, complementary to, or opposed against policies at other governmental levels, such as migration (Bazurli 2020; Williamson 2020) and digitization (Bramwell 2020). They analyze more conventional urban policy fields such as housing (Donaghy 2020) and large-scale infrastructure development (Hinze and Smith 2020), with fresh insights about the contemporary moment.…”
Section: Articles In the Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She isolates which federal immigration policies are most present in cities and shows that local officials craft different types of local immigration policies if they experience welcoming or punitive national policy. Bramwell (2020) explores both the opportunities for multilevel politics and the constraints of hierarchy. She examines whether sector-specific policy silos, levels of government, and state and societal divides can be bridged in the case of “ordinary cities” trying to cope with the disruptive potential of digital economic transformations.…”
Section: All Policy Making Is Multilevelmentioning
“…Such relationships are of particular importance to the broader question of how non-core regions and cities can stimulate innovation through public policy (Bramwell 2020). Research on the geographies of immigrant entrepreneurship in Canada has begun to document the diverging opportunity structures of primary and secondary cities for newcomers.…”
This paper makes a case for post‐graduate international students as an increasingly important category of immigrant entrepreneur in Canada. We draw our findings from an analysis of new provincial immigrant entrepreneur programs and interviews with international student entrepreneurs in a mid‐sized city in Atlantic Canada. We argue that three forces have become increasingly relevant in shaping immigrant entrepreneurs' opportunity structures: (1) the internationalization of higher education institutions (HEIs), (2) the corporatization of HEIs, and (3) the regionalization of immigration. We show how public policy shifts in immigration and education have expanded the opportunity structure for international student start‐ups. These entrepreneurs are navigating multiple dimensions of risk that stem from being both temporary migrants and business owners.
This study asks if Black mayors’ individual and collective responses to George Floyd’s killing were qualitatively different than mayoral reactions to the deaths of Michael Brown and Freddie Gray. Specifically, I examine whether Black mayors rejected the “timeworn” tradition of respectability politics in favor of a new paradigm in 2020. I also consider the characteristics of mayors, cities, and media that may explain this change. My original dataset includes 232 public statements issued by 31 Black mayors during either the Obama administration (2014–2015) or Trump administration (2020). I find that the cohort of Black mayors leading large cities during Era 2 were demonstrably less likely to activate respectability politics when talking about Floyd’s murder than their predecessors. I discuss the implications of these observations considering the political climate mayors are confronting at the time of writing, around the 2-year anniversary of Floyd’s death.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.