Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches

Abstract

The study of the relationships between innovation and the competitiveness of industries is an important topic for both, academic research and economic policy. The huge economics literature flourished in the last couple of decades on the subject broadly falls into two distinct research traditions, namely the mainstream R&D spillovers approach and the evolutionary economics view. Both traditions agree on the important role played by innovation and the intersectoral diffusion of advanced knowledge for the competitive performance of industrial sectors. Behind this general agreement, however, the two approaches are radically different. This paper shows that, at a deeper level of analysis, the mainstream and evolutionary views do indeed differ with respect to their theoretical foundations, empirical research and policy implications. In a nutshell, while the mainstream R&D spillover approach is inspired by a traditional view of economic policy based on a market-oriented approach, the evolutionary view is on the contrary consistent with the idea that institutional arrangements and policy interventions do indeed play a fundamental role for shaping innovation patterns and their impacts on the competitiveness of industries.

A decision support methodology to enhance the competitiveness of the Turkish automotive industry

“…Guan et al (2006) assert that an exploration of quantitative relationships between technological innovation capability and competitiveness suggests a close internal relationship between these two variables. Similarly, Castellacci (2008) The competitiveness of an industry is analysed generally on the basis of a single perspective. However, a measure of industry competitiveness should cover a much broader perspective and highlight the factors that have the greatest impact on shaping the competitiveness of that industry.…”

Estratégias de Produção e a Relação com a Prática de Inovação Tecnológica

“…O reconhecimento da importância estratégica da inovação e da tecnologia está aumentando de forma intensificada, diversos autores (Castellacci, 2008;Gibson & Naquin, 2011;Sener & Saridogan, 2011;Calmanovici, 2011;Simonceska, 2012) têm apontado a importância da inovação para a competitividade das empresas. Porter (2004) ressalta a importância da inovação de produto para estimular o desenvolvimento da indústria e possibilitar a diferenciação, a inovação de processo, por sua vez, acaba por afetar toda a estrutura da indústria ao variar a intensidade do seu processo, as economias de escala, a proporção dos custos fixos, a integração vertical, entre outros aspectos.…”

Mapowanie technologii – jako instrument zarządzania zmianą technologiczną regionu

“…24 Zalety mapowania nie mogą jednak przesłaniać faktu, że -mimo prostej logiki -sam proces mapowania jest procesem trudnym, wymagającym szerokiej wiedzy eksperckiej i dobrego przygotowania organizacyjnego, zwłaszcza że musi uwzględnić wielość obszarów, które trzeba poddać dekompozycji i analizie oraz powiązaniu za pośrednic-twem szeregu siatek analitycznych. 25 I choć można spotkać szereg praktycznych wskazówek dotyczących zasad i stosowania mapowania, to nie są one wystarczająco użyteczne, bo każdorazowe zastosowanie metody wymaga daleko idącej indywidualizacji działań, odpowiadającej specyfice indywidualnie zdefiniowanych celów całego procesu.…”