2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
122
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…We will base our subsequent (theoretical and empirical) analyses on this classification. In this way, we also aim at contributing to addressing calls for a better integration of rather fragmented and heterogeneous literature on aspects related to academic entrepreneurship into stronger and more consistent theoretical frameworks (Schmitz et al 2017).…”
Section: Academic Spin-offs and The Critical Resources For Their Creamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will base our subsequent (theoretical and empirical) analyses on this classification. In this way, we also aim at contributing to addressing calls for a better integration of rather fragmented and heterogeneous literature on aspects related to academic entrepreneurship into stronger and more consistent theoretical frameworks (Schmitz et al 2017).…”
Section: Academic Spin-offs and The Critical Resources For Their Creamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our proposal of an integrated framework for analyzing the different types of factors that help understand and explain academic entrepreneurship, can also be deemed as a contribution to another academic call. We refer here to the need of a better integration of rather fragmented and heterogeneous literature on aspects related to academic entrepreneurship into stronger and more consistent theoretical frameworks (Schmitz et al 2017).…”
Section: Contribution To Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic entrepreneurship exhibits various descriptions (Schmitz, Urbano, Dandolini, de Souza, & Guerrero, 2017) whereas we follow the definition proposed by Etzkowitz, Webster, Gebhardt, and Terra (2000) for academic entrepreneurial activities that 'are undertaken with the objective of improving regional or national economic performance as well as the university's financial advantage and that of its faculty p. 313'. In distinction to academic innovation we define academic entrepreneurship more oriented towards value creation (measured, e.g., by patents, licensing spin-offs, business ventures, financial rewards, etc.)…”
Section: Hi G Her Educ Ati On P Olicie S and Ac Ademic Entrepreneurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field suffers from a lack of definitions (Pittaway, Hannon, Gibb, & Thompson, 2009;Schmitz, Urbano, Dandolini, Souza & Guerrero, 2017), of goal alignment within specific programs (Canziani, Welsh, Hsieh, & Tullar, 2015;Lorz, 2013;Nabi, Liñán, Fayolle, Krueger, & Walmsley, 2016) of an integrating theoretical framework (Canziani, Welsh, Hsieh, & Tullar, 2015;Nabi et al, 2017;Pittaway, et al, 2009;von Graevenitz, 2010), and a mixture of measures of effectiveness (Daunfeldt & Elert, 2013;Hoppe, 2016;Mwasalwiba, 2010;Sirelkhatim, Gangi, & Nisar, 2015). The state of EE from the point of view of a researcher is ripe for development.…”
Section: Chapter I: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%