2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation and by-product valorization: A comparative analysis of the absorptive capacity of food processing firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enhance global harmonization for fifth quarter utilization, actions from national agencies and local policymakers will be crucial. Furthermore, a recent research has highlighted the importance of incumbent firms’ absorptive capacity, which is concerned with how firms acquire and utilize external knowledge in order to further add innovation and value creation (Strøm‐Andersen, 2020). To enhance the utilization of the fifth quarter , it is important that the meat industry advance their absorptive capacity through knowledge development, entrepreneurial experimentation, and resource mobilization to ensure innovation, value creation, and competitive advantage.…”
Section: Future Perspectives In the Utilization Of The Fifth Quartermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance global harmonization for fifth quarter utilization, actions from national agencies and local policymakers will be crucial. Furthermore, a recent research has highlighted the importance of incumbent firms’ absorptive capacity, which is concerned with how firms acquire and utilize external knowledge in order to further add innovation and value creation (Strøm‐Andersen, 2020). To enhance the utilization of the fifth quarter , it is important that the meat industry advance their absorptive capacity through knowledge development, entrepreneurial experimentation, and resource mobilization to ensure innovation, value creation, and competitive advantage.…”
Section: Future Perspectives In the Utilization Of The Fifth Quartermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environment Internal Influence effectiveness of learning processes (Fahy et al, 2014;Waring & Currie, 2009), in relation to power (Collien, 2018;Harman, 2012;Lawrence, 2005), and politics (Ferdinand, 2004) Influence of power and politics on the occurrence of learning processes (Whittle et al, 2016) External Influence patterns of learning (Miller & Lin, 2010), and benefits (Garriga et al, 2013;Nagle, 2018;Uotila et al, 2009;Zhao et al 2018) Influence learning from acquisition process (Cuypers et al, 2017;Kim & Finkelstein, 2009;Muehlfeld et al, 2012;Rothaermel & Hess, 2007;Uhlenbruck et al, 2006), learning from networks (Manring & Moore, 2006;Strøm-Andersen, 2020), and external intermediary actors (Polidoro, 2020) The external environment (macroeconomic factors) significantly influences the occurrence and effectiveness of learning processes at the intraorganizational level. Moreover, several studies have highlighted how different patterns of learning might occur in firms in relation to the external environment and the epistemologies within organizations (Miller & Lin, 2010) and how this can benefit firms differently (Garriga et al, 2013;Nagle, 2018;Uotila et al, 2009;Zhao et al 2018).…”
Section: Sub-level Intraorganization Interorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, learning from acquisitions might be stimulated or limited (Muehlfeld et al, 2012;Rothaermel & Hess, 2007) in relation to the similarity and complementarity of firms (Kim & Finkelstein, 2009) or the strategy (Uhlenbruck et al, 2006) and information they possess (Cuypers et al, 2017). Further, the presence of external networks and external actors (such as regulatory agencies acting as intermediaries (Polidoro, 2020) could encourage a positive interaction among competences, notions, and perspectives, such as stimulating a sustainable development of network members towards a triple bottom line approach (Manring & Moore, 2006;Strøm-Andersen, 2020).…”
Section: Sub-level Intraorganization Interorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, bone COL I has been explored and innovation is required to reach the desired functionality in bone sources. (Gomez-Guillen et al, 2011;Ravindran & Jaiswal, 2016;Strøm-Andersen, 2020;Sultana et al, 2018). New solutions have been proposed to obtain COL I in the bone matrix, which has to be demineralized and protein fraction preserved, such possible approaches that facilitate making bone COL I available (Buckley, 2016;Ferraro et al, 2016;Fu et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%