2012
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2011.647875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation: a knowledge transfer perspective

Abstract: One means of innovation is the adoption of new knowledge from external sources. This article describes theory building research to improve the transfer of knowledge between universities and businesses that are collaborating together. Using pilot studies and in-depth interviews based on real-life innovation projects, the research identified and confirmed two hypothetical constructs; that successful knowledge transfer comes from the transfer of tacit knowledge; and that tacit knowledge can best be transferred in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge transfer in a university context is a term used to encapsulate a wide range of activities ranging from less formal joint projects between universities and industry such as joint publications, student projects and executive education to more formal collaborative research, consultancy and start up activity (Alexander and Childe 2013;Perkmann et al 2013). University knowledge transfer activities exist at multiple levels and involve a wide range of internal and external stakeholders such as general administrative staff, various subject faculties, staff within dedicated research centres, knowledge transfer managers, university senior managers, government bodies, research funders, industry and societal stakeholders (Robinson et al 2010;Miller et al 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Transfer Within a University Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowledge transfer in a university context is a term used to encapsulate a wide range of activities ranging from less formal joint projects between universities and industry such as joint publications, student projects and executive education to more formal collaborative research, consultancy and start up activity (Alexander and Childe 2013;Perkmann et al 2013). University knowledge transfer activities exist at multiple levels and involve a wide range of internal and external stakeholders such as general administrative staff, various subject faculties, staff within dedicated research centres, knowledge transfer managers, university senior managers, government bodies, research funders, industry and societal stakeholders (Robinson et al 2010;Miller et al 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Transfer Within a University Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can occur across dyadic or multiple relationships and via a range of knowledge transfer mechanisms (or channels) (Alexander and Childe 2013). With increasing pressure to make an impact on society, combined with reduced funding streams, universities are actively trying to develop their collaborations with industry (Miller et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For industry to be able to exploit knowledge, our previous work has shown that that knowledge is needed to support action. We therefore take the view in this study that for useful exploitation, a successful transfer of knowledge would be one that resulted in the transfer of tacit knowledge [5].…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By focussing on certain attributes or properties of knowledge the framework can be used to aid in planning a knowledge transfer activity and visualising how knowledge might flow during the project. This will in-turn affect decisions on governance (where a partnering style of governance can lead to more tacit knowledge being transferred [30]), geographic location of the knowledge partner (in relation to the ability to hold face to face meetings [5]) amongst a number of other factors. Future research in the this area will focus on balancing the extensive qualitative data collected within this study with more objective measurements of performance, again taken across completed knowledge transfer project as the second, more deductive phase of theory development (according to [31]).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation