2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovant agromaterials formulated with flax shaves and proteinic binder: Process and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good adherence of the components, re ected by the formation of a layer of protein binder on the surface of the bers and the presence of borax and boric acid microcrystals adhered to this layer, can be explained based on the ndings of Gu et al (2020) about the crosslinking of the soy protein in the presence of borate. Similar behavior in terms of the formation of a protein layer on the surface of the bers has also been reported for other systems such as soy protein/ ax bers (El Hajj et al, 2012) and pea protein/ ax bers (Lazko et al, 2013).…”
Section: Morphologysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The good adherence of the components, re ected by the formation of a layer of protein binder on the surface of the bers and the presence of borax and boric acid microcrystals adhered to this layer, can be explained based on the ndings of Gu et al (2020) about the crosslinking of the soy protein in the presence of borate. Similar behavior in terms of the formation of a protein layer on the surface of the bers has also been reported for other systems such as soy protein/ ax bers (El Hajj et al, 2012) and pea protein/ ax bers (Lazko et al, 2013).…”
Section: Morphologysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Besides, Gu et al (2020) have shown that soy protein can crosslink in the presence of borate, leading to good adhesive properties. (Khosravi et al 2010) The boards described in Table 1 have been produced through three manufacturing methods: hot-press molding (Mahmood et al 2016;Khosravi et al 2010), bond molding (Cai et al 2016;Lazko et al 2013;Palumbo et al 2015) and blending microwave radiation (El Hajj et al 2012). Boards manufactured by hot pressing have a higher density and exural strength than boards manufactured by bond molding but lower thermal insulation properties due to the resulting decrease in porosity (Liu et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is necessary because both the SEM and X-Ray μCT techniques could not quantitatively show the magnitude and degree of surface roughness and for better comparison and presentation of various surface roughness responses. This innovative technique has been effectively used in biomedical/bio-engineering research by McGill and Mackay [39], Oha and Watanabe [40], physical science by Crocker and Grier [41] and composite technology by Hajj et al [42]. Therefore, based on the advantages of this technique, it was adopted to investigate the surface roughness.…”
Section: Cvm Micrographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results shown that samples with coarser flax-shaves and with a lower quantity of binder were better performing in terms of sound absorption and thermal insulation (Fig. 11) , but also softer [29].…”
Section: Flaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound absorption coefficient of two samples of different size of flax-tow fibres (thickness 5cm) [18] Figure 11.Sound absorption coefficient of flax-tow samples evaluated in[29] Figure 12. Absorption coefficient of LECA sample of different thickness[30] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%