2016
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner nuclear membrane protein Lem2 augments heterochromatin formation in response to nutritional conditions

Abstract: Inner nuclear membrane proteins interact with chromosomes in the nucleus and are important for chromosome activity. Lem2 and Man1 are conserved members of the LEM-domain nuclear membrane protein family. Mutations of LEM-domain proteins are associated with laminopathy, but their cellular functions remain unclear. Here, we report that Lem2 maintains genome stability in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. S. pombe cells disrupted for the lem2 + gene (lem2Δ) showed slow growth and increased rate of the mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
113
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(173 reference statements)
8
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conserved pathway may likewise underlie the requirement for Src1, a LEM-domain protein in Aspergillus nidulans , in the formation of stable nuclei (37). This body of work suggests that LEM2 plays a specific, initiating role in coordinating membrane remodeling events, particularly during nuclear assembly, in addition to the other roles it plays as a NE resident during interphase (31, 35, 3843). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conserved pathway may likewise underlie the requirement for Src1, a LEM-domain protein in Aspergillus nidulans , in the formation of stable nuclei (37). This body of work suggests that LEM2 plays a specific, initiating role in coordinating membrane remodeling events, particularly during nuclear assembly, in addition to the other roles it plays as a NE resident during interphase (31, 35, 3843). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-terminal tagging and gene disruption were performed using PCR-generated fragments as described previously (Bähler et al, 1998; Sato et al, 2005). The minichromosome loss assay was carried out as described previously (Niwa et al, 1989; Tange et al, 2016). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no. 600-401-215; Rockland Immunochemicals) at 1:200 dilution for 2 h, washed three times with PBS, then incubated with FluoroNano gold-conjugated anti-rabbit Fab′ also conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) at 1:400 dilution for 1 h. The immunolabeled cells were fixed with 2.5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 1 h. After washing with 50 mM HEPES (pH 5.8), they were incubated with silver enhancement reagent (Tange et al, 2016) for 7 min. The reaction was stopped by washing three times with distilled water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%