2009
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner ear anatomy is a proxy for deducing auditory capability and behaviour in reptiles and birds

Abstract: Inferences of hearing capabilities and audition-related behaviours in extinct reptiles and birds have previously been based on comparing cochlear duct dimensions with those of living species. However, the relationship between inner-ear bony anatomy and hearing ability or vocalization has never been tested rigorously in extant or fossil taxa. Here, micro-computed tomographic analysis is used to investigate whether simple endosseous cochlear duct (ECD) measurements can be fitted to models of hearing sensitivity,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
235
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
235
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively large olfactory lobes of Halcyornis suggest that this species had a reasonable reliance on its sense of smell. The heightened sensory capabilities of Halcyornis are further illustrated by our estimates for hearing sensitivity, which are far higher than the values calculated by Walsh et al (2009) for Odontopteryx and Prophaethon. Since the vocalization range of most birds falls within the lower half of their hearing sensitivity (Konishi 1970), Halcyornis is likely to have had a relatively wide and high vocalization frequency range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively large olfactory lobes of Halcyornis suggest that this species had a reasonable reliance on its sense of smell. The heightened sensory capabilities of Halcyornis are further illustrated by our estimates for hearing sensitivity, which are far higher than the values calculated by Walsh et al (2009) for Odontopteryx and Prophaethon. Since the vocalization range of most birds falls within the lower half of their hearing sensitivity (Konishi 1970), Halcyornis is likely to have had a relatively wide and high vocalization frequency range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The endosseous cochlear duct is slightly curved and relatively long, with a mean length of almost 5.0 mm measured from the base of the pars vestibularis. Using the methods of Walsh et al (2009) to estimate mean hearing range and sensitivity from the scaled and transformed endosseous cochlear duct length, we calculate that Halcyornis would have had a mean hearing range of approximately 5900 Hz and a mean hearing sensitivity of approximately 3400 Hz Figure 5. Hearing sensitivity of Halcyornis toliapicus (A, hearing range; B, mean hearing) based on regressions calculated from data derived from living bird and reptile species (see Walsh et al 2009; reproduced with permission of Royal Society Publishing).…”
Section: Diencephalon the Optic Nerves (Ii;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inner ear of Brookesia is morphologically unique and comparative data suggest that it may be optimized to detect weak accelerations, probably important to ensure postural stability. Indeed, the semicircular canals are very different from those observed for arboreal chamaeleons, such as C. tigris or other arboreal lizards such as A. carolinensis, and resemble those of other slow-moving terrestrial vertebrates such as turtles and tuatara (Walsh et al 2009). Our observations suggest distinct morphological adaptations to the tail and sensory systems allowing these animals to exploit terrestrial habitats, despite the presence of specialized grasping feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cochlear duct is elongated, such that it extends far ventral to the brain endocast and is approximately as long dorsoventrally as the depth of the semicircular canals. A long duct is a synapomorphy of tyrannosauroids (20,26), different from the much shorter ducts of most other theropods, and would have increased sensitivity to lower-frequency sounds (37,38) and may possibly have been related to complex vocalizations and sociality (38).…”
Section: Description and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%