2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-006-5941-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innately adaptive robotics through embodied evolution

Abstract: -Autonomous adaptation in robots has become recognised as crucial for devices deployed in remote or inhospitable environments. The aim of this work is to investigate autonomous robot adaptation, focussing on damage recovery and adaptation to unknown environments. An embodied evolutionary algorithm is introduced and its capabilities demonstrated with experimental results. This algorithm is shown to be able to control the motion of a robot snake effectively; this same algorithm inherently recovers the snake's mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, TBR-Evolution is the first algorithm designed to generate a large number of efficient gaits without requiring to learn each of them separately, or to test complex controllers for each direction. In addition, our experiments only rely on internal, embedded measurements, which is critical for autonomy, but not considered in most previous studies (e.g., Kohl and Stone (2004); Zykov et al (2004); Chernova and Veloso (2004); Yosinski et al (2011); Mahdavi and Bentley (2006)).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, TBR-Evolution is the first algorithm designed to generate a large number of efficient gaits without requiring to learn each of them separately, or to test complex controllers for each direction. In addition, our experiments only rely on internal, embedded measurements, which is critical for autonomy, but not considered in most previous studies (e.g., Kohl and Stone (2004); Zykov et al (2004); Chernova and Veloso (2004); Yosinski et al (2011); Mahdavi and Bentley (2006)).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with physical legged robots, the majority of studies only considers the evolution of un-driven walking controllers and, most of the time, the task consists in finding a controller that maximizes the forward walking speed (Zykov et al, 2004;Chernova and Veloso, 2004;Hornby et al, 2005;Berenson et al, 2005;Yosinski et al, 2011;Mahdavi and Bentley, 2006). Papers on alternatives to evolutionary algorithms, like policy gradients (Kohl and Stone, 2004;Tedrake et al, 2005) or Bayesian optimization (Calandra et al, 2014;Lizotte et al, 2007), are also focused on robot locomotion along a straight line.…”
Section: Evolving Walking Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the speed of operation, this algorithm reduces the number of candidate solutions at the expense of accuracy. Similarly, EA has been applied for damage recovery on a snake robot with a damaged body in [23] and a four-legged robot with a broken leg [24].…”
Section: Resilient Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods usually employed are policy gradient methods [11,14,24] or evolutionary algorithms [9,13,20,4,15], which optimize the controller's performances according to a desired action. They were successfully applied to several domains, from snake crawling [18] to bipedal walking [24].…”
Section: Learning Low Level Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%