2020
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innate Molecular and Cellular Signature in the Skin Preceding Long-Lasting T Cell Responses after Electroporated DNA Vaccination

Abstract: DNA vaccines delivered with electroporation (EP) have shown promising results in preclinical models and are evaluated in clinical trials. In this study, we aim to characterize early mechanisms occurring in the skin after intradermal injection and EP of the auxoGTUmultiSIV DNA vaccine in nonhuman primates. First, we show that EP acts as an adjuvant by enhancing local inflammation, notably via granulocytes, monocytes/macrophages, and CD1a int-expressing cell recruitment. EP also induced Langerhans cell maturatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the neoantigen-specific immune response in the periphery of tumor-bearing mice was not a clear biomarker of the antitumor response it suggests that the quality of the responses rather than the site of vaccination, ID vs. IM, is an important determinant. Our preliminary data identify some differences in the immune responses between C20-ID and C20-IM, however, we cannot exclude that other electrical conditions may favor neoantigen-specific CD8 + IFN + T cells immune response in the ID protocol 47 , 48 . The lack of antitumor activity of NCV with αPD1 in this therapeutic protocol is in line with previous evidence showing that treatment with αPD1 before vaccination had a negative impact on tumor growth 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although the neoantigen-specific immune response in the periphery of tumor-bearing mice was not a clear biomarker of the antitumor response it suggests that the quality of the responses rather than the site of vaccination, ID vs. IM, is an important determinant. Our preliminary data identify some differences in the immune responses between C20-ID and C20-IM, however, we cannot exclude that other electrical conditions may favor neoantigen-specific CD8 + IFN + T cells immune response in the ID protocol 47 , 48 . The lack of antitumor activity of NCV with αPD1 in this therapeutic protocol is in line with previous evidence showing that treatment with αPD1 before vaccination had a negative impact on tumor growth 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the Zika virus outbreak in 2015, a Zika DNA vaccine delivered via electroporation was developed into a phase 1 clinical trial within 7 months [15]. EP combined with DNA vaccination greatly increases the efficacy of DNA vaccines [16][17][18]. Because of the successful results of animal experiments after DNA vaccination with EP, many different electroporation devices for humans have been developed, including Cellectra1 (Inovio Inc., USA) and TriGrid1 (Ichor Medical Systems, USA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular immunity will need to be explored thoroughly to enable better prediction of vaccine immunogenicity. As already discussed, local cellular events shape subsequent protective responses [36,[211][212][213]. Thus, their characterization can provide a way to rapidly assess the quality of vaccine-induced immunity.…”
Section: Defining New Correlates Of Protectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As mentioned previously, early local events in the skin following immunization can shape subsequent immune responses and vaccine efficacy [36,[211][212][213]. In other respects, the acquisition of immune memory characterizes adaptive responses and is of critical importance for vaccines to confer long-lasting protection.…”
Section: Deciphering Mechanisms That Underly Immune Protective Responsesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation