2003
DOI: 10.2307/1342709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inmate Litigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Podkul (2011) reports for instance, that local correctional officials sometimes hold immigration detainees for an unconstitutionally long period in order to maximize profits. As a result of these practices, and other cost-cutting measures, such as rationing health care, some jails could find themselves at increased risk of litigation (Schlanger, 2003). A third unintended consequence of expanding capacity to hold inmates for other jurisdictions is that some sheriffs have actually overbuilt, and they cannot fill their empty beds.…”
Section: Expanding Capacity In Local Jailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Podkul (2011) reports for instance, that local correctional officials sometimes hold immigration detainees for an unconstitutionally long period in order to maximize profits. As a result of these practices, and other cost-cutting measures, such as rationing health care, some jails could find themselves at increased risk of litigation (Schlanger, 2003). A third unintended consequence of expanding capacity to hold inmates for other jurisdictions is that some sheriffs have actually overbuilt, and they cannot fill their empty beds.…”
Section: Expanding Capacity In Local Jailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the most comprehensive studies of jail litigation, Schlanger (2003) reports the top three sources of individual lawsuits in jails are medical care, use of force, and personal injury. In terms of class action lawsuits, by contrast, the three main reasons are medical care, search policies and crowding.…”
Section: Standards Litigation and Accreditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…940-41), and an Exxon-funded research program on punitive damages reinforced the view that punitive damages awards were too unpredictable (Hastie and Viscusi 1998, p. 916;Kahneman 2000, p. 1173;Schkade 1998, p. 2078;Sunstein et al 2002). 7 Beginning in the 1990s, however, virtually every empirical study of court-based punitive damages has revealed a strong, statistically significant correlation between punitive and compensatory damages (Eisenberg et al 1997(Eisenberg et al , 2002(Eisenberg et al , 2006Eisenberg andWells 1998, 1999;Karpoff and Lott 1999, p. 543;Moller, Pace, and Carroll 1999, p. 300;Schlanger 2003Schlanger , p. 1605Sharkey 2006). Even the largest punitive damages awards, those that were $100 million or greater, showed a statistically significant association with the compensatory award (Eisenberg and Wells 2006).…”
Section: Prior Empirical Literature On Punitive Damages and Securitiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Supreme Court considers successive habeas filings ''abuse of the writ,'' and Congress has strictly controlled the number of petitions death row inmates can file (Rose v. Lundy 1982;Felker v. Turpin 1996;AEDPA 1996AEDPA sec. 2244 (1)); Schlanger 2003).…”
Section: The Condemned Body As a Political Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%