23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inlet and Aft Tonal Noise Predictions of a Full-Scale Turbofan Engine with Bifurcation and Inlet Distortion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Winkler and al. [39] also made similar observations. Contradictorily, the results presented by Namgoong and Arisetti [41] show the presence of a strong acoustic field produced by the ESS at 2nd harmonic BPF, which propagates up into the bypass duct.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical and Experimental Far Field Datasupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Winkler and al. [39] also made similar observations. Contradictorily, the results presented by Namgoong and Arisetti [41] show the presence of a strong acoustic field produced by the ESS at 2nd harmonic BPF, which propagates up into the bypass duct.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical and Experimental Far Field Datasupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Research by Holewa et al [37] and by Redonnet and Druon [38] suggest that bifurcations and struts cause a richer modal content of the RSI tones due to several mechanisms: i) sound generation by the rotor wake (vortical) interaction with those structural elements, ii) scattering of the acoustic waves into new modes as they propagate through obstacles, and iii) impact of the potential field of the bifurcations on the rotor wake structure before they interact with the stator. This can not only jeopardize a cut-off fan design as shown by Winkler et al [39] but also result in a smoother directivity in the far field. In fact, the acoustic scattering at the bypass bifurcations suffices to significantly change the far field directivity as observed by Chen et al [40].…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical and Experimental Far Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have therefore focused on the impact of distortion on the noise emitted by turbofan engines [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is typically the case during landing or take-off operations (angle of attack around 10°-15°) where airport neighbours are the most exposed to noise nuisance. Several recent studies have therefore focused on the impact of distortion on the noise emitted by turbofan engines [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. They have shown that the tone noise characteristics can be significantly modified by: (a) introducing new acoustic sources caused by the distortion/fan blades interaction [3][4][5], (b) modifying the conventional fan-blade wakes/Outlet Guide Vanes (OGVs) interaction [3][4][5]8], and (c) modifying the generation and propagation of fan-blade shocks at transonic speeds [1][2][3][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the associated computational cost is very high and the radiation of acoustic waves outside of the nacelle cannot be correctly captured over an important distance. Most of the studies [1,3,7] are therefore based on a two-step methodology where the CFD solution is chained to a Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) solver to propagate and radiate the shocks. The latter methodology is chosen here using the CFD/CAA chaining strategy developed by Thisse et al [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%