Diagnostisch Instrument Voor Apraxie Van De Spraak 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-313-9060-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inleiding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Witte et al (2017) reported on a patient with a cerebellar lesion who exhibited apraxia of speech but not ataxic dysarthria. The authors defined apraxia of speech as articulatory groping and segmentation, which they diagnosed using the Diagnostic Instrument Apraxia of Speech (Feiken and Jonkers, 2012). The authors defined ataxic dysarthria as distorted vowels, imprecise consonants, excess and equal stress, and irregular articulatory breakdowns, which they diagnosed using ScreeLing, which is a linguistic screening test that was designed to assess the presence of aphasia (Visch-Brink et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Witte et al (2017) reported on a patient with a cerebellar lesion who exhibited apraxia of speech but not ataxic dysarthria. The authors defined apraxia of speech as articulatory groping and segmentation, which they diagnosed using the Diagnostic Instrument Apraxia of Speech (Feiken and Jonkers, 2012). The authors defined ataxic dysarthria as distorted vowels, imprecise consonants, excess and equal stress, and irregular articulatory breakdowns, which they diagnosed using ScreeLing, which is a linguistic screening test that was designed to assess the presence of aphasia (Visch-Brink et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%