Inleiding

Kuhk, Annette; Heynen, Hilde; Huybrechts, Liesbeth; Schreurs, Jan; Moulaert, Frank

doi:10.2307/j.ctvrs8xrk.5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While participatory trajectories are again becoming part of the professional planning standards (a.o. Kuhk et al 2019) and self-organizational practices are more and more recognized as important drivers for socio-spatial transformation (a.o, Boonstra 2015; Boonstra and Rawls 2021), the transformative potential of deliberative democratic practice and its possibility to respond to existing networks of power, is questioned (Zakhour 2020;Metzger, Soneryd, and Linke 2017;Gualini 2015;Parker and Street 2015;Campbell, Tait, and Watkins 2014;Sager 2011).…”

Section: Participation As Collective Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning to reflect collectively: how to create the right environment for discussing participatory planning practice?

Blust

Devisch

Vandenabeele

2021

European Planning Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial planning as a field in continuous transition needs a way of working that allows for questioning its professional practice. In this paper, we focus on the design of 4-days long 'studios' for planning professionals that aim to reflect on new notions of democratic practice and participatory planning. During these studios, different methods to enhance a collective reflective attitude among participants were tested. The paper describes how the tutors of the studios tried to encourage participants to develop their own theory of practice by iteratively (re)designing the learning artefacts, learning content and learning modes of the studio. In the conclusions of this paper, we introduce the idea of a Participation Studio Conjecture Map to support and structure a culture of collective reflection-in (participatory planning) organizations.

show abstract