2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inkjet-printed disposable metal complexing indicator-displacement assay for sulphide determination in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cu-PAN complex was prepared as described in the literature [8,9] according to Scheme 1. A solution of 0.5 mmol copper(II) chloride dihydrate (≥99.99% trace metals basis, ALDRICH Chemistry, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 3 mL of distilled water was added to a solution of 0.5 mmol 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphtol (H-PAN) (indicator grade, SIGMA-ALDRICH, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 75 mL of ethanol (HPLC gradient grade, ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu-PAN complex was prepared as described in the literature [8,9] according to Scheme 1. A solution of 0.5 mmol copper(II) chloride dihydrate (≥99.99% trace metals basis, ALDRICH Chemistry, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 3 mL of distilled water was added to a solution of 0.5 mmol 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphtol (H-PAN) (indicator grade, SIGMA-ALDRICH, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 75 mL of ethanol (HPLC gradient grade, ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu-PAN complex was prepared as described in literature [3,4]. A solution of 0.5 mmol copper(II) chloride dihydrate (≥99.99% trace metals basis, ALDRICH Chemistry) in 3 mL distilled water was added to a solution of 0.5 mmol 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphtol (Indicator Grade, SIGMA-ALDRICH) in 75 mL ethanol (HPLC Gradient Grade, ROTH).…”
Section: Preparation Of the Cu-pan Test Stripesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the presented sulfide enrichment/determination method, the others show some limitations in the limit of detection, 19,20,38−44 linear dynamic range, 20,42 and the range of the sample analyzed. 19,20,38,40,41,43,44 …”
Section: Comparison With the Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%